Shiota T, Jones M, Delabays A, Li X, Yamada I, Ishii M, Acar P, Holcomb S, Pandian N G, Sahn D J
The Clinical Care Center for Congenital Heart Disease, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, USA.
Circulation. 1997 Nov 18;96(10):3687-95. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.96.10.3687.
Evaluation of flow convergence (FC) with two-dimensional (2D) imaging systems may not be sufficiently accurate to characterize these often asymmetric, complex phenomena. The aim of this study was to validate a three-dimensional (3D) method for determining the severity of aortic regurgitation (AR) in an experimental animal model.
In six sheep with surgically induced chronic AR, 20 hemodynamically different states were studied. Instantaneous regurgitant flow rates were obtained by aortic and pulmonary electromagnetic flow meters. Video composite data of color Doppler flow mapping images were transferred into a TomTec computer after computer-controlled 180 degrees rotational acquisition. Direct measurement of the 3D reconstructed FC surface areas as well as measurements of FC areas estimated with 2D methods with hemispherical and hemielliptical assumptions were performed, and values were multiplied by the aliasing velocity to obtain peak regurgitant flow rates. There was better agreement between 3D and electromagnetically derived flow rates than there was between the 2D and the reference values (r=.94, y=1.0x-0.16, difference=0.02 L/min for the 3D method; r=.80, y=1.6x-0.3, difference=1.2 L/min for the 2D hemispherical method; r=.75, y=0.90x+0.2, difference=-0.20 L/min for the 2D hemielliptical method).
Without any geometrical assumption, the 3D method provided better delineation of the FC zones and direct measurements of FC surface areas, permitting more accurate quantification of the severity of AR than the 2D methods.
使用二维(2D)成像系统评估血流会聚(FC)可能不足以准确表征这些通常不对称的复杂现象。本研究的目的是在实验动物模型中验证一种用于确定主动脉瓣反流(AR)严重程度的三维(3D)方法。
对六只通过手术诱导产生慢性AR的绵羊,研究了20种血流动力学不同的状态。通过主动脉和肺动脉电磁流量计获得瞬时反流流速。在计算机控制的180度旋转采集后,将彩色多普勒血流成像图像的视频复合数据传输到TomTec计算机中。对三维重建的FC表面积进行直接测量,以及对采用半球形和半椭圆形假设的二维方法估计的FC面积进行测量,并将这些值乘以混叠速度以获得反流峰值流速。三维测量值与电磁测量的流速之间的一致性优于二维测量值与参考值之间的一致性(三维方法:r = 0.94,y = 1.0x - 0.16,差值 = 0.02 L/min;二维半球形方法:r = 0.80,y = 1.6x - 0.3,差值 = 1.2 L/min;二维半椭圆形方法:r = 0.75,y = 0.90x + 0.2,差值 = -0.20 L/min)。
三维方法无需任何几何假设,能更好地描绘FC区域并直接测量FC表面积,与二维方法相比,能更准确地量化AR的严重程度。