Paolisso G, Galderisi M, Tagliamonte M R, de Divitis M, Galzerano D, Petrocelli A, Gualdiero P, de Divitis O, Varricchio M
Department of Geriatric Medicine and Metabolic Diseases, 2nd University of Naples, Italy.
Am J Hypertens. 1997 Nov;10(11):1250-6. doi: 10.1016/s0895-7061(97)00262-8.
In hypertensive patients the presence of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy has been associated with a more severe degree of insulin resistance. Whether myocardial wall thickness or LV geometry are associated with a different degree of insulin resistance is still unknown in essential hypertensives. For this reason 26 men with new diagnosed essential hypertension were enrolled. All patients underwent echocardiographic examination and euglycemic hyperinsulinemic glucose clamp combined with indirect calorimetry. According to LV mass and relative wall thickness data, all patients were categorized in four groups: 1) patients with a normal geometric LV pattern (n = 8) (PAT = 0); 2) patients with concentric remodeling LV mass (n = 8) (PAT = 1); 3) patients with eccentric LV hypertrophy (n = 3) (PAT = 2); and 4) patients with concentric LV hypertrophy (n = 7) (PAT = 3). All groups were similar for anthropometric characteristics. Patients with normal echocardiographic LV pattern (PAT = 0) had higher whole body glucose disposal (WBGD), oxidative and nonoxidative glucose metabolism, and lower lipid oxidation than patients with abnormal echocardiographic LV patterns (PAT = 1 to 3). Nevertheless, no significant differences among the groups with abnormal echocardiographic patterns were found. After controlling for age, body mass index (BMI), waist/hip ratio (WHR), and mean arterial blood pressure, only sum of the wall thickness was significantly correlated with fasting plasma insulin (r = -0.38, P < .05), WBGD (r = - 0.50, P < .009), and NOGM (r = - 0.48, P < .02). In multivariate analysis, a model made by age, BMI, WHR, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and WBGD explained 38% of the echocardiographic pattern variability. In this model, WBGD (P < .02) was significantly and independently associated with echocardiographic patterns explaining 19% of the echocardiographic pattern variability. In conclusion, our data demonstrate that in arterial hypertension hyperinsulinemia/insulin resistance mainly affects myocardial wall thickness, whereas only a trivial association with LV geometry occurs.
在高血压患者中,左心室(LV)肥厚的存在与更严重程度的胰岛素抵抗有关。在原发性高血压患者中,心肌壁厚度或左心室几何形态是否与不同程度的胰岛素抵抗相关仍不清楚。因此,招募了26名新诊断的原发性高血压男性患者。所有患者均接受了超声心动图检查以及正常血糖高胰岛素葡萄糖钳夹试验并结合间接测热法。根据左心室质量和相对壁厚度数据,将所有患者分为四组:1)左心室几何形态正常的患者(n = 8)(PAT = 0);2)向心性重塑左心室质量的患者(n = 8)(PAT = 1);3)离心性左心室肥厚的患者(n = 3)(PAT = 2);4)向心性左心室肥厚的患者(n = 7)(PAT = 3)。所有组在人体测量学特征方面相似。超声心动图左心室形态正常(PAT = 0)的患者比超声心动图左心室形态异常(PAT = 1至3)的患者具有更高的全身葡萄糖处置(WBGD)、氧化和非氧化葡萄糖代谢,以及更低的脂质氧化。然而,在超声心动图形态异常的组之间未发现显著差异。在控制年龄、体重指数(BMI)、腰臀比(WHR)和平均动脉血压后,仅壁厚度总和与空腹血浆胰岛素(r = -0.38,P <.05)、WBGD(r = -0.50,P <.009)和非氧化葡萄糖代谢(r = -0.48,P <.02)显著相关。在多变量分析中,由年龄、BMI、WHR、收缩压和舒张压以及WBGD构成的模型解释了超声心动图形态变异性的38%。在该模型中,WBGD(P <.02)与超声心动图形态显著且独立相关,解释了超声心动图形态变异性的19%。总之,我们的数据表明,在动脉高血压中,高胰岛素血症/胰岛素抵抗主要影响心肌壁厚度,而与左心室几何形态仅有轻微关联。