Suppr超能文献

白大衣抵抗性高血压

White-coat resistant hypertension.

作者信息

Mezzetti A, Pierdomenico S D, Costantini F, Romano F, Bucci A, Di Gioacchino M, Cuccurullo F

机构信息

Centro per lo Studio dell' Ipertensione Arteriosa, delle Dislipidemie e dell' Arteriosclerosi, Istituto di Fisiopatologia Medica, Chieti, Italy.

出版信息

Am J Hypertens. 1997 Nov;10(11):1302-7. doi: 10.1016/s0895-7061(97)00318-x.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether sustained hypertensives with high clinic blood pressure, despite multiple drug treatment, show a true resistant hypertension or a "white-coat effect," and whether the pretreatment white-coat effect is maintained despite pharmacological therapy. The occurrence of resistant hypertension was determined in 250 consecutive essential hypertensives who had had an ambulatory blood pressure monitoring before treatment assignment. Twenty-seven of 250 hypertensives with persistently high clinic blood pressure despite 3 months of adequate pharmacological therapy underwent further ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Using our internal standards, seven patients had a true resistant hypertension whereas 20 subjects showed a large white-coat effect (white-coat resistant hypertension), ie, high clinic blood pressure (> 140/90) but "normal" ambulatory daytime (< 139/90 mm Hg) and 24 h (135/85 mm Hg) blood pressure. Using other cutoff points for ambulatory blood pressure, 134/90 and 135/85 mm Hg for daytime blood pressure, 10 and 13 patients, respectively, were reclassified as true resistant hypertensives and 17 and 14, respectively, were white-coat resistant hypertensives. Interestingly, in white-coat resistant hypertensives the large differences between clinic and ambulatory daytime blood pressure (white-coat effect), recorded before treatment assignment, were not affected by drugs and remained constant over time. Left ventricular mass index in white-coat resistant hypertensives was significantly lower than in truly resistant hypertensives, suggesting that prognosis could differ between these groups. In this study, using either our internal standards or some other cutoffs reported in the literature, the white-coat phenomenon was an important cause of resistant hypertension. The use of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in these patients may avoid misdiagnosis of resistant hypertension, unnecessary overtreatment, and expensive procedures to look for possible secondary hypertension.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估尽管接受了多种药物治疗,但临床血压仍高的持续性高血压患者是否表现为真正的顽固性高血压或“白大衣效应”,以及药物治疗后预处理时的白大衣效应是否持续存在。在250例连续的原发性高血压患者中确定了顽固性高血压的发生率,这些患者在分配治疗前进行了动态血压监测。250例高血压患者中,尽管进行了3个月的充分药物治疗,但临床血压持续偏高,其中27例患者接受了进一步的动态血压监测。按照我们的内部标准,7例患者患有真正的顽固性高血压,而20例受试者表现出较大的白大衣效应(白大衣性顽固性高血压),即临床血压高(>140/90)但动态日间血压(<139/90 mmHg)和24小时血压(135/85 mmHg)“正常”。使用其他动态血压临界值,日间血压为134/90和135/85 mmHg时,分别有10例和13例患者被重新分类为真正的顽固性高血压患者,分别有17例和14例为白大衣性顽固性高血压患者。有趣的是,在白大衣性顽固性高血压患者中,治疗分配前记录的临床血压与动态日间血压之间的巨大差异(白大衣效应)不受药物影响,且随时间保持不变。白大衣性顽固性高血压患者的左心室质量指数显著低于真正的顽固性高血压患者,这表明这些组之间的预后可能不同。在本研究中,无论是按照我们的内部标准还是文献中报道的其他临界值,白大衣现象都是顽固性高血压的一个重要原因。对这些患者使用动态血压监测可避免顽固性高血压的误诊、不必要的过度治疗以及寻找可能的继发性高血压的昂贵检查。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验