Friedell G H, Linville L H, Rubio A, Wagner W D, Tucker T C
Markey Cancer Center, Cancer Control Program, University of Kentueky, Lexington 40536-0098, USA.
Cancer Pract. 1997 Nov-Dec;5(6):367-74.
The authors describe a framework for developing an effective, community-focused cancer control program.
Progress in the application of cancer control interventions has proven to be quite variable across different populations and communities. The Kentucky Cancer Program, developed under joint sponsorship of cancer centers at two state universities, has been using a model that appears to provide a high degree of sensitivity to community-specific problems and solutions. The Kentucky four-step model includes 1) using data from a population-based cancer registry and other sources to identify problems; 2) ensuring community involvement with providers in selecting the target population and developing the intervention strategy; 3) implementing the intervention plan; and 4) using cancer registry and other data to evaluate the impact of this intervention.
This framework may be useful to providers as they try to balance the goals of their clinical practice and the goals of community cancer control. Developing an effective, community-focused cancer control program requires that providers gain a solid knowledge about their community. The depth and richness of that knowledge base is enhanced by the active participation of community members as they collaborate with the providers on planning and implementing cancer control activities.
作者描述了一个用于制定有效、以社区为重点的癌症控制项目的框架。
事实证明,癌症控制干预措施在不同人群和社区中的应用进展差异很大。在两所州立大学的癌症中心联合赞助下制定的肯塔基癌症项目,一直在使用一种似乎对社区特定问题和解决方案具有高度敏感性的模式。肯塔基四步模式包括:1)利用基于人群的癌症登记处和其他来源的数据来识别问题;2)确保社区与提供者共同参与选择目标人群并制定干预策略;3)实施干预计划;4)利用癌症登记处和其他数据评估该干预措施的影响。
当提供者试图平衡其临床实践目标和社区癌症控制目标时,这个框架可能会对他们有所帮助。制定一个有效、以社区为重点的癌症控制项目要求提供者深入了解他们的社区。社区成员与提供者合作规划和实施癌症控制活动时的积极参与,会增强该知识库的深度和丰富性。