Bristow L J, Collinson N, Cook G P, Curtis N, Freedman S B, Kulagowski J J, Leeson P D, Patel S, Ragan C I, Ridgill M, Saywell K L, Tricklebank M D
Merck, Sharp and Dohme Research Laboratories, Neuroscience Research Centre, Terlings Park, Harlow, Essex, CM20 2QR, United Kingdom.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1997 Dec;283(3):1256-63.
This study examined the high-affinity, selective dopamine D4 receptor antagonist, L-745,870 (3-([4-(4-chlorophenyl)piperazin-1-yl]methyl)-1H-pyrrolo[2, 3-b]pyridine) in rodent behavioral models used to predict antipsychotic potential and side-effect liabilities in humans. In contrast to the classical neuroleptic, haloperidol, and the atypical neuroleptic, clozapine, L-745,870 failed to antagonize amphetamine-induced hyperactivity in mice or impair conditioned avoidance responding in the rat at doses selectively blocking D4 receptors. Furthermore, L-745,870 failed to reverse the deficit in prepulse inhibition of acoustic startle responding induced by the nonselective dopamine D2/3/4 receptor agonist apomorphine, an effect which was abolished in rats pretreated with the D2/3 receptor antagonist, raclopride (0.2 mg/kg s.c.). L-745,870 had no effect on apomorphine-induced stereotypy in the rat but did induce catalepsy in the mouse, albeit at a high dose of 100 mg/kg, which is likely to occupy dopamine D2 receptors in vivo. High doses also impaired motor performance; in rats L-745,870 significantly reduced spontaneous locomotor activity (minimum effective dose = 30 mg/kg) and in mice, L-745,870 reduced the time spent on a rotarod revolving at 15 rpm (minimum effective dose = 100 mg/kg). Altogether these results suggest that dopamine D4 receptor antagonism is not responsible for the ability of clozapine to attenuate amphetamine-induced hyperactivity and conditioned avoidance responding in rodents. Furthermore, the lack of effect of L-745,870 in these behavioral tests is consistent with the inability of the compound to alleviate psychotic symptoms in humans.
本研究在用于预测人类抗精神病潜力和副作用倾向的啮齿动物行为模型中,检测了高亲和力、选择性多巴胺D4受体拮抗剂L-745,870(3-([4-(4-氯苯基)哌嗪-1-基]甲基)-1H-吡咯并[2,3-b]吡啶)。与经典抗精神病药氟哌啶醇和非典型抗精神病药氯氮平不同,L-745,870在选择性阻断D4受体的剂量下,未能拮抗小鼠中苯丙胺诱导的多动,也未损害大鼠的条件性回避反应。此外,L-745,870未能逆转由非选择性多巴胺D2/3/4受体激动剂阿扑吗啡诱导的听觉惊吓反应前脉冲抑制缺陷,在用D2/3受体拮抗剂雷氯必利(0.2mg/kg皮下注射)预处理的大鼠中,该效应被消除。L-745,870对大鼠中阿扑吗啡诱导的刻板行为没有影响,但在小鼠中确实诱导了僵住症,尽管是在100mg/kg的高剂量下,这在体内可能占据多巴胺D2受体。高剂量也损害运动性能;在大鼠中,L-745,870显著降低自发运动活性(最小有效剂量=30mg/kg),在小鼠中,L-745,870减少在15rpm旋转的转杆上停留的时间(最小有效剂量=100mg/kg)。总之,这些结果表明,多巴胺D4受体拮抗作用并非氯氮平在啮齿动物中减弱苯丙胺诱导的多动和条件性回避反应能力的原因。此外,L-745,870在这些行为测试中缺乏作用,与该化合物无法缓解人类精神病症状一致。