Suppr超能文献

人体可溶性胰岛素和胰岛素类似物赖脯胰岛素诱导的低血糖的症状及生理反应。

Symptomatic and physiological responses to hypoglycaemia induced by human soluble insulin and the analogue Lispro human insulin.

作者信息

McCrimmon R J, Frier B M

机构信息

Department of Diabetes, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh NHS Trust, Scotland.

出版信息

Diabet Med. 1997 Nov;14(11):929-36. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199711)14:11<929::AID-DIA477>3.0.CO;2-4.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the glycaemic threshold for onset of the clinically detectable sympatho-adrenal (autonomic) reaction (defined as 'R') to hypoglycaemia induced by Lispro human insulin, with that induced by human soluble insulin (HS). The hypoglycaemia symptom profile, counterregulatory hormonal responses, and cognitive performance at R were also compared. Sixteen patients with IDDM, aged 32.5 (20-45) (median (range)) years and duration of IDDM 3.0 (0.5-4.5) years participated in a randomized, double-blind study during which intravenous infusions of either Lispro or HS insulin (2.0 mU kg(-1) min(-1)) were used on separate occasions to lower the blood glucose to the level at which R was induced. For both HS and Lispro, significant increments in systolic blood pressure (p<0.05), heart rate (p<0.05), and in autonomic (p<0.05) and neuroglycopenic symptom scores (p<0.05) occurred at R, and a significant deterioration was observed in cognitive performance (p<0.05). In response to hypoglycaemia, a significant increase from baseline occurred in plasma concentrations of all of the counterregulatory hormones (p<0.01) and the magnitude of response and temporal pattern did not differ, nor were any significant differences apparent between HS and Lispro insulins for any of the variables studied. The autonomic reaction occurred at a blood glucose (mean +/- SD) of 2.0 (+/- 0.6) mmol(-1) for Lispro and 1.9 (+/- 0.6) mmol(-1) for HS, which did not differ significantly. Thus, at the autonomic reaction to hypoglycaemia no significant differences were evident in the glycaemic threshold, symptom profile, physiological responses, and counterregulatory hormonal responses between Lispro and human soluble insulin in IDDM patients.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较赖脯人胰岛素与普通胰岛素(HS)诱发低血糖时,临床可检测到的交感-肾上腺(自主神经)反应(定义为“R”)的血糖阈值。同时还比较了在反应“R”时的低血糖症状谱、反调节激素反应及认知功能。16例胰岛素依赖型糖尿病(IDDM)患者,年龄32.5(20 - 45)岁(中位数(范围)),IDDM病程3.0(0.5 - 4.5)年,参与了一项随机双盲研究,研究期间分别在不同时间静脉输注赖脯胰岛素或普通胰岛素(2.0 mU kg⁻¹ min⁻¹),以使血糖降至诱发反应“R”的水平。对于普通胰岛素和赖脯胰岛素,在反应“R”时收缩压(p<0.05)、心率(p<0.05)、自主神经症状评分(p<0.05)和神经低血糖症状评分(p<0.05)均显著增加,且认知功能显著恶化(p<0.05)。低血糖反应时,所有反调节激素的血浆浓度均较基线显著升高(p<0.01),反应幅度和时间模式无差异,且在研究的任何变量上,普通胰岛素和赖脯胰岛素之间均无显著差异。赖脯胰岛素诱发自主神经反应时的血糖水平(均值±标准差)为2.0(±0.6)mmol⁻¹,普通胰岛素为1.9(±0.6)mmol⁻¹,两者无显著差异。因此,在IDDM患者中,赖脯胰岛素和普通胰岛素在低血糖自主神经反应时,血糖阈值、症状谱、生理反应及反调节激素反应均无显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验