Roozendaal B, Koolhaas J M, Bohus B
Department of Animal Physiology, University of Groningen, Haren, The Netherlands.
Acta Physiol Scand Suppl. 1997;640:51-4.
Recent views on stress emphasise the existence of more than one response pattern to stressful events, and the importance of individual differences in coping with environmental challenges. Therefore, in the evaluation of the specific contribution of the central nucleus of the amygdala (CEA) in stress and adaptation it has to be considered whether the stress is acute or conditioned, and whether it requires active or passive styles of coping. Based on series of our own studies, we propose that the CEA is consistently involved in the organisation of processes of passive coping, reflected in immobile behaviour and parasympathetic activity. Furthermore, a differential regulation of the CEA via its peptidergic neuronal input may underlie the distinct behavioural and physiological stress patterns accompanying the different styles of coping. Additionally, the involvement of the CEA in neuroendocrine control is addressed. The CEA exerts a general, modulatory influence on the neuroendocrine control to acute stressors, whereas this output during conditioned stress seems to be independent of the CEA. The neuroendocrine state as achieved during acute stress is, via feedback to the brain, of importance in learning about the situation, and to consolidate the experience. In this review an attempt is made to provide an integrated model of CEA functioning in relation to stress and adaptation.
最近关于应激的观点强调,对应激事件存在不止一种反应模式,以及个体差异在应对环境挑战中的重要性。因此,在评估杏仁核中央核(CEA)在应激和适应中的具体作用时,必须考虑应激是急性的还是条件性的,以及它需要主动还是被动的应对方式。基于我们自己的一系列研究,我们提出CEA始终参与被动应对过程的组织,这体现在不动行为和副交感神经活动中。此外,通过其肽能神经元输入对CEA的差异性调节可能是伴随不同应对方式的独特行为和生理应激模式的基础。此外,还讨论了CEA在神经内分泌控制中的作用。CEA对急性应激源的神经内分泌控制具有普遍的调节作用,而在条件性应激期间这种输出似乎与CEA无关。急性应激期间所达到的神经内分泌状态,通过对大脑的反馈,对于了解情况和巩固经验很重要。在这篇综述中,我们试图提供一个关于CEA在应激和适应方面功能的综合模型。