Videbaek L M, Jacobsen I A
Medical Department C, Odense University Hospital, Denmark.
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1997 Nov;35(11):514-8.
The pharmacokinetics of amlodipine 5 mg and felodipine ER (extended release) 5 mg o.d. after single and 2 weeks of repeated oral doses, were compared in 28 essential hypertensive patients using a crossover design. As a secondary parameter the effects of the drugs on blood pressure were assessed. Significant differences were found between all principal pharmacokinetic variables, when comparing the 2 treatments after both single and repeated dosing. The coefficients of variation of maximal drug concentration and AUC after single dosing and at steady-state were significantly higher for felodipine ER than for amlodipine. After repeated dosing the peak-to-trough plasma concentration ratio were 1.58 and 4.43 (p < 0.001) for amlodipine and felodipine ER, respectively. Both drugs lowered systolic and diastolic blood pressure to the same extent after 2 weeks of repeated dosing. No significant differences between the blood pressure lowering vs time profile of the 2 drugs were encountered. In conclusion, the interpatient drug concentration variability and the peak-to-trough plasma concentration ratio were more favorable for amlodipine compared to felodipine ER. It remains to be established whether these characteristics are also reflected in a more smooth and consistent blood pressure control.
采用交叉设计,在28例原发性高血压患者中比较了单次口服和连续2周重复口服5毫克氨氯地平和5毫克缓释非洛地平后的药代动力学。作为次要参数,评估了药物对血压的影响。在单次给药和重复给药后比较两种治疗时,所有主要药代动力学变量之间均发现显著差异。非洛地平缓释片单次给药和稳态时的最大药物浓度和AUC变异系数显著高于氨氯地平。重复给药后,氨氯地平和非洛地平缓释片的峰谷血浆浓度比分别为1.58和4.43(p<0.001)。连续2周重复给药后,两种药物降低收缩压和舒张压的程度相同。两种药物的降压与时间曲线之间未发现显著差异。总之,与非洛地平缓释片相比,氨氯地平的患者间药物浓度变异性和峰谷血浆浓度比更有利。这些特征是否也反映在更平稳和一致的血压控制中仍有待确定。