Wise A J, Bowman S L
Depart. of Counseling and Psychology and Guidance Services, Ball State University, Muncie, Indiana 47306, USA.
Violence Vict. 1997 Summer;12(2):127-35.
This study compared responses of masters and doctoral level counseling students to two domestic violence scenarios. Participants read a two paragraph description of a battering incident involving either a heterosexual or lesbian couple and then gave their impressions via a series of open and closed ended questions. Scenarios were identical save the manipulation of sexual partner as same or opposite sex. Experience and/or education with battered and/or gay/lesbian clients is also examined. Results indicated that subjects perceived the heterosexual battering incident as more violent than the lesbian battering incident and would be more likely to charge the male batterer than the female batterer with assault. Differences in treatment recommendations were made according to sexual orientation of the victim. Less than half of the respondents had coursework or practical experience pertaining to domestic violence and/or gay/lesbian concerns.
本研究比较了硕士和博士水平的咨询专业学生对两种家庭暴力场景的反应。参与者阅读了一段两段式的描述,内容是涉及异性恋或女同性恋伴侣的殴打事件,然后通过一系列开放式和封闭式问题给出他们的印象。场景除了将性伴侣设定为同性或异性外完全相同。同时还考察了与受虐和/或同性恋客户相关的经验和/或教育情况。结果表明,受试者认为异性恋殴打事件比女同性恋殴打事件更暴力,并且比起指控女性施暴者,更有可能指控男性施暴者犯有攻击罪。根据受害者的性取向,在治疗建议上存在差异。不到一半的受访者有与家庭暴力和/或同性恋问题相关的课程学习或实践经验。