Adams R, Ruffin R, Campbell D
Respiratory Medicine Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, SA.
Aust N Z J Med. 1997 Oct;27(5):550-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.1997.tb00963.x.
A semi-quantitative index of lipid-laden macrophages on broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL) has been reported to be highly sensitive but only moderately specific for aspiration in adults. There has been little published literature evaluating this technique since the original report.
To assess the value of a lipid-laden macrophage index (LLMI) of greater than 100 to confirm the clinical diagnosis of aspiration in patients with abnormal radiological investigations.
Prospective evaluation of 80 adult patients with abnormal radiology was undertaken using BAL and the LLMI. A diagnosis of aspiration was made prior to bronchoscopy if the patient had one or more of: clinically witnessed aspiration, positive barium swallow or speech pathology assessment; or an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy showed severe reflux oesophagitis and the patient had a history consistent with aspiration.
Eighteen patients were diagnosed with aspiration. Of these, 17 had an index > 100, and one had an index of 94 (mean 157, 99% CI 127-187, range 94-238). Of the other 62 subjects, seven had an index > 100 (mean 46, 99% CI 22-70, range 0-303). There was a significant difference between index scores for the two groups (p = 0.002). For aspiration, an index > 100 had a sensitivity of 94% and a negative predictive value of 98%. The specificity was 89%, with a positive predictive value of 71%.
The LLMI is a sensitive indicator for aspiration causing radiological lung disease in adults. Its lack of specificity means it cannot be the sole means of diagnosis, but it can allow better targeting of other investigations in those patients in whom bronchoscopy is undertaken to investigate radiological abnormalities.
据报道,支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)中脂质性巨噬细胞的半定量指标对成人误吸具有高度敏感性,但特异性仅为中等。自最初报告以来,很少有文献对该技术进行评估。
评估脂质性巨噬细胞指数(LLMI)大于100对确诊影像学检查异常患者误吸临床诊断的价值。
对80例影像学检查异常的成年患者进行前瞻性评估,采用BAL和LLMI。如果患者有以下一项或多项情况,则在支气管镜检查前诊断为误吸:临床可见误吸、吞钡试验阳性或言语病理学评估阳性;或上消化道内镜检查显示严重反流性食管炎且患者有与误吸相符的病史。
18例患者被诊断为误吸。其中,17例指数>100,1例指数为94(平均157,99%可信区间127 - 187,范围94 - 238)。在其他62名受试者中,7例指数>100(平均46,99%可信区间22 - 70,范围0 - 303)。两组的指数评分有显著差异(p = 0.002)。对于误吸,指数>100的敏感性为94%,阴性预测值为98%。特异性为89%,阳性预测值为71%。
LLMI是成人误吸导致放射性肺病的敏感指标。其缺乏特异性意味着它不能作为唯一的诊断手段,但它可以使对因影像学异常而进行支气管镜检查的患者进行其他检查时更具针对性。