Suppr超能文献

氯氮平对惊吓前脉冲抑制作用的矛盾发现:是给药途径还是大鼠品系的原因?

Discrepant findings of clozapine effects on prepulse inhibition of startle: is it the route or the rat?

作者信息

Swerdlow N R, Varty G B, Geyer M A

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla 92093-0804, USA.

出版信息

Neuropsychopharmacology. 1998 Jan;18(1):50-6. doi: 10.1016/S0893-133X(97)00110-3.

Abstract

Studies examined methodological differences that might account for discrepant reports related to the ability of clozapine to restore prepulse inhibition (PPI) of acoustic startle in apomorphine (APO)-treated rats. Changes in PPI after APO and clozapine were compared in Sprague. Dawley (SD) versus Wistar rats. In SD rats, intraperitoneal administration of clozapine (4-12 mg/kg) completely reversed the PPI-disruptive effects of APO (0.5 mg/kg), with significant effects evident at the lowest dose of clozapine. Compared to SD rats, Wistars exhibited a relatively weaker (but statistically significant) disruption of PPI with the same or higher doses of APO and were also less sensitive to the PPI-restorative effects of clozapine. Clozapine administered via subcutaneous route completely restored PPI after APO treatment in SD rats. Discrepant findings with this model can be attributed to differences in rat strain; SD rats exhibit patterns of drug responses in this model that are optimal for examining profiles of putative atypical antipsychotics.

摘要

多项研究考察了方法学上的差异,这些差异可能解释了与氯氮平恢复阿扑吗啡(APO)处理大鼠听觉惊跳前脉冲抑制(PPI)能力相关的不一致报告。在斯普拉格-道利(SD)大鼠与Wistar大鼠中比较了APO和氯氮平处理后PPI的变化。在SD大鼠中,腹腔注射氯氮平(4 - 12毫克/千克)完全逆转了APO(0.5毫克/千克)对PPI的破坏作用,在氯氮平最低剂量时就有显著效果。与SD大鼠相比,Wistar大鼠在相同或更高剂量的APO作用下,PPI的破坏相对较弱(但具有统计学意义),并且对氯氮平恢复PPI的作用也不太敏感。皮下注射氯氮平可使SD大鼠在APO处理后完全恢复PPI。该模型中出现的不一致结果可归因于大鼠品系的差异;在这个模型中,SD大鼠表现出的药物反应模式最适合用于研究假定的非典型抗精神病药物的特征。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验