Kamara S G, Van Der Hyde V A
Med Law. 1997;16(3):607-20.
Alcohol and drug patients were randomized into two groups, one receiving three months and the other six months of outpatient treatment to determine differences in treatment outcomes. Most clients had received prior 30 days of inpatient treatment. Patients were contacted after the first 70 days of outpatient treatment and 12 refused participation. Consenters were randomized and assigned into control (n = 103) and experimental (n = 127) groups, and interviewed at discharge, and three and six months later. A gratuity of $10.00 was offered after a completed phone interview. Data were analyzed using chi-square, t-test, and multivariate logistic regression techniques. Controls had lower treatment drop-out and higher follow-up attrition rates than experimentals. There were no major differences in reported subsequent alcohol/drug use, or attendance to aftercare, Alcohol Anonymous (AA) and support groups during the 3 and 6 months follow-up surveys. More controls re-entered treatment than experimentals at 3 months post-treatment, but there was no such difference at 6 months post-treatment. In terms of ancillary effects, experimentals had slightly more desirable outcomes with respect to abstinence at time of discharge, and use of cocaine at 3 months follow-up. Controls were more likely to use cocaine and less likely to re-enter inpatient treatment or attend aftercare than experimentals. At six months the few who reported using painkillers were controls. Relapse was predictably influenced both at 3 and 6 months by pretreatment use of cocaine as primary drug, and by duration of abstinence from all chemicals. The predictive influence of cocaine was greater at 3 than at 6 months post-discharge.
酒精和药物成瘾患者被随机分为两组,一组接受为期三个月的门诊治疗,另一组接受为期六个月的门诊治疗,以确定治疗效果的差异。大多数患者此前已接受过30天的住院治疗。在门诊治疗的前70天之后,研究人员联系了患者,有12人拒绝参与。同意参与的患者被随机分为对照组(n = 103)和实验组(n = 127),并在出院时、出院后三个月和六个月接受访谈。完成电话访谈后会提供10美元的酬金。数据采用卡方检验、t检验和多因素逻辑回归技术进行分析。与实验组相比,对照组的治疗退出率较低,但随访失访率较高。在为期3个月和6个月的随访调查中,两组在后续酒精/药物使用情况或参加后续护理、戒酒互助会(AA)及支持小组方面没有重大差异。治疗后3个月,重新接受治疗的对照组患者比实验组患者多,但治疗后6个月没有这种差异。在辅助效果方面,实验组在出院时的戒酒情况以及随访3个月时的可卡因使用情况方面,有稍好的结果。与实验组相比,对照组更有可能使用可卡因,重新进入住院治疗或参加后续护理的可能性更小。在6个月时,少数报告使用止痛药的是对照组患者。可以预见,在3个月和6个月时,复发受治疗前将可卡因作为主要药物使用的情况以及所有化学物质戒断持续时间的影响。出院后3个月时,可卡因的预测影响比6个月时更大。