Krampe Henning, Stawicki Sabina, Wagner Thilo, Bartels Claudia, Aust Carlotta, Rüther Eckart, Poser Wolfgang, Ehrenreich Hannelore
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Georg-August-University, and Max-Planck-Institute of Experimental Medicine, Goettingen, Germany.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2006 Jan;30(1):86-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2006.00013.x.
(1) To perform a 9-year study of abstinence, lapse, and relapse in 180 chronic alcoholic patients, participants of the Outpatient Longterm Intensive Therapy for Alcoholics (OLITA); (2) To investigate the role of supervised alcohol deterrents (AD) in relapse prevention and as an adjunct for maintenance of long-term abstinence.
This prospective open treatment study evaluates the long-term course of drinking outcomes and AD use of 180 chronic alcoholics consecutively admitted from 1993 to 2002. Subsamples are compared for (1) sham-AD versus verum-AD (disulfiram/calcium carbimide), (2) coped lapses versus finally detrimental lapses versus malignant relapses, and (3) AD use for 13 to 20 versus >20 months.
In this 9-year study, the cumulative probability of not having relapsed was 0.52, and that of not having consumed any alcohol was 0.26. Despite long-term use, disulfiram/calcium carbimide was well tolerated. Patients on sham-AD (due to contraindications to verum-AD) showed higher cumulative abstinence probability than patients on verum (S = 0.86 vs. S = 0.49, p = 0.03). Detrimental lapses and malignant relapses occurred earlier than successfully coped lapses (p < 0.001); patients with detrimental lapse and with malignant relapse had fewer days of AD intake and less subsequent days without AD than patients with coped lapse (p < 0.001). The cumulative abstinence probability was S = 0.75 for patients with long-term intake compared with S = 0.50 for patients who stopped AD between months 13 and 20 (p < 0.001).
An abstinence rate of >50% in this 9-year study strongly supports the concept of comprehensive, long-term outpatient treatment of alcoholics. Supervised, guided intake of AD, also over extended periods, can be used as a predominantly psychologically acting ingredient of successful alcoholism therapy.
(1)对180名慢性酒精中毒患者(门诊长期酗酒者强化治疗项目(OLITA)的参与者)进行为期9年的戒酒、复吸和再复发情况研究;(2)调查监督使用酒精威慑剂(AD)在预防复发以及作为维持长期戒酒辅助手段中的作用。
这项前瞻性开放治疗研究评估了1993年至2002年连续收治的180名慢性酒精中毒患者饮酒结果和AD使用情况的长期病程。对以下子样本进行比较:(1)安慰剂AD组与真药AD组(双硫仑/卡马西平);(2)应对性复吸组与最终有害性复吸组与恶性再复发组;(3)AD使用13至20个月组与使用超过20个月组。
在这项为期9年的研究中,未复发的累积概率为0.52,未饮用任何酒精的累积概率为0.26。尽管长期使用,双硫仑/卡马西平耐受性良好。安慰剂AD组患者(因真药AD存在禁忌)的累积戒酒概率高于真药组(S = 0.86对S = 0.49,p = 0.03)。有害性复吸和恶性再复发比成功应对性复吸出现得更早(p < 0.001);有害性复吸和恶性再复发的患者服用AD的天数更少,后续无AD的天数也比应对性复吸的患者少(p < 0.001)。长期服用AD的患者累积戒酒概率为S = 0.75,而在第13至20个月停用AD的患者累积戒酒概率为S = 0.50(p < 0.001)。
在这项为期9年的研究中,戒酒率超过50%有力地支持了对酗酒者进行全面、长期门诊治疗的理念。监督下、有指导地服用AD,即使是长期服用,也可作为成功戒酒治疗中主要起心理作用的成分。