• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对北爱尔兰长期住院精神科患者的3至6年随访。

A 3- to 6-year follow-up of former long-stay psychiatric patients in Northern Ireland.

作者信息

Donnelly M, McGilloway S, Mays N, Perry S, Lavery C

机构信息

Health and Health Care Research Unit, Queen's University of Belfast, Northern Ireland.

出版信息

Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1997 Nov;32(8):451-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00789139.

DOI:10.1007/BF00789139
PMID:9409160
Abstract

Little is known about the first patients who left hospital before and during the official implementation of the hospital discharge policy in Northern Ireland. This study describes patterns of residential provision for former long-stay patients (approximately two-thirds of whom had an ICD-9 diagnosis of schizophrenia) discharged from the six major psychiatric hospitals in Northern Ireland between 1987 and 1990 (n = 321). It also employs several instruments within a retrospective survey design to examine outcomes for a 35% sample of people (112/321) discharged between 1997 and 1990 and followed up in 1993. Almost two-thirds (61%) had been discharged to independent living or low-staffed statutory settings. None of the group was homeless, one person was in prison and three people had committed suicide during the first 2 years after discharged. Almost one-third had to be re-admitted at some stage during the 6-year period and 13% had died. 'Moderate' to 'major problems' with most daily living skills were reported for less than 25% of people, while 15% or less had problem behaviour. Approximately 90% or more were satisfied with most aspects of their new homes and most also reported feeling happier (77%), healthier (63%) and more independent (78%) since discharge. However, social, recreational and occupational opportunities were limited. Purchasers, providers and practitioners need to review ways in which former long-stay patients might be empowered to live more meaningful and integrated lives in the community, particularly as the current government strategy for health and social well-being (1997-2002) in Northern Ireland points to the closure of existing psychiatric hospitals.

摘要

对于在北爱尔兰医院出院政策正式实施之前及实施期间就已出院的首批患者,人们了解甚少。本研究描述了1987年至1990年间从北爱尔兰六家主要精神病医院出院的 former long-stay患者(其中约三分之二的ICD-9诊断为精神分裂症)的居住安置模式(n = 321)。该研究还在一项回顾性调查设计中采用了多种工具,以检验1990年至1997年间出院并于1993年接受随访的35%的患者(112/321)的结局。近三分之二(61%)的患者出院后入住独立生活场所或人员配备较少的法定机构。在出院后的头两年里,该组患者中无人无家可归,1人入狱,3人自杀。在6年期间,近三分之一的患者在某个阶段不得不再次入院,13%的患者已经死亡。报告显示,不到25%的患者在大多数日常生活技能方面存在“中度”至“严重问题”,而存在问题行为的患者比例为15%或更低。约90%或更多的患者对新家的大多数方面感到满意,大多数患者还表示自出院以来感觉更快乐(77%)、更健康(63%)和更独立(78%)。然而,社会、娱乐和职业机会有限。购买者、提供者和从业者需要审视如何增强 former long-stay患者的能力,使其在社区中过上更有意义、更融入社会的生活,特别是鉴于北爱尔兰当前的健康和社会福祉政府战略(1997 - 2002年)指出要关闭现有的精神病医院。

相似文献

1
A 3- to 6-year follow-up of former long-stay psychiatric patients in Northern Ireland.对北爱尔兰长期住院精神科患者的3至6年随访。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1997 Nov;32(8):451-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00789139.
2
A three- to six-year follow-up of former long-stay residents of mental handicap hospitals in Northern Ireland.对北爱尔兰智障医院前长期住院患者进行的三至六年随访。
Br J Clin Psychol. 1997 Nov;36(4):585-600. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1997.tb01263.x.
3
[Deinstitutionalization of long-stay psychiatric patients in upper austria - living situation, social and clinical characteristics more than one year after discharge].[奥地利上奥地利州长期住院精神科患者的非机构化——出院一年多后的生活状况、社会和临床特征]
Psychiatr Prax. 2004 May;31(4):192-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-814915.
4
Team for the Assessment of Psychiatric Services (TAPS) Project 33: prospective follow-up study of long-stay patients discharged from two psychiatric hospitals.精神科服务评估团队(TAPS)项目33:两家精神病医院出院的长期住院患者的前瞻性随访研究。
Am J Psychiatry. 1996 Oct;153(10):1318-24. doi: 10.1176/ajp.153.10.1318.
5
Quality of life and social functioning of former long-stay psychiatric patients transferred into the community: a 10 year follow up study.长期住院精神病人转入社区后的生活质量和社会功能:一项 10 年随访研究。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2018 Aug;53(8):795-801. doi: 10.1007/s00127-018-1520-3. Epub 2018 Apr 28.
6
Service utilisation by former long-stay psychiatric patients in Northern Ireland.北爱尔兰长期住院精神科患者康复后的服务利用情况。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 1998 Spring;44(1):12-21. doi: 10.1177/002076409804400102.
7
The TAPS project. 17: Readmission to hospital for long term psychiatric patients after discharge to the community.TAPS项目。17:长期精神病患者出院回归社区后的再次入院情况。
BMJ. 1992 Oct 24;305(6860):996-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6860.996.
8
Long-term outcome of state hospital patients discharged into structured community residential settings.转入结构化社区居住环境的国立医院出院患者的长期预后。
Psychiatr Serv. 1995 Jan;46(1):73-8. doi: 10.1176/ps.46.1.73.
9
Community integration of former state hospital patients: outcomes of a policy shift in Vermont.前州立医院患者的社区融入:佛蒙特州政策转变的结果
Psychiatr Serv. 1996 Oct;47(10):1088-92. doi: 10.1176/ps.47.10.1088.
10
A survey of new long-stay hospital patients in an Irish health board area.
Psychiatr Serv. 1995 Apr;46(4):394-8. doi: 10.1176/ps.46.4.394.

引用本文的文献

1
Suicide Rates After Discharge From Psychiatric Facilities: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.精神科机构出院后的自杀率:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Jul 1;74(7):694-702. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.1044.
2
Is psychiatric residential facility discharge possible and predictable? A multivariate analytical approach applied to a prospective study in Italy.精神科住院机构的出院是否可行且可预测?一项应用于意大利前瞻性研究的多变量分析方法。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2014 Jan;49(1):157-67. doi: 10.1007/s00127-013-0705-z. Epub 2013 May 28.
3
Impact of a rehabilitation legislation on the survival in the community of long-term patients discharged from psychiatric hospitals in Israel.

本文引用的文献

1
The psychosocial functioning inventory.
Eval Health Prof. 1983 Mar;6(1):25-48. doi: 10.1177/016327878300600102.
2
Closing the asylums: where do all the former long-stay patients go?关闭精神病院:所有从前的长期住院患者都去哪儿了?
Health Trends. 1992;24(3):88-90.
3
The TAPS Project. 13: Clinical and social outcomes of long-stay psychiatric patients after one year in the community.TAPS项目。13:长期住院精神科患者在社区生活一年后的临床和社会结局。
Br J Psychiatry Suppl. 1993 Apr(19):45-56.
一项康复立法对以色列精神病医院出院的长期患者社区生存情况的影响。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2006 Feb;41(2):87-94. doi: 10.1007/s00127-005-0008-0. Epub 2006 Feb 1.
4
The closure of a long-stay psychiatric hospital: a longitudinal study of patients' behavior.一家长期住院精神病院的关闭:对患者行为的纵向研究
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1994 Jul;29(4):184-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00802016.
5
The TAPS Project. 22: A five-year follow-up of long-stay psychiatric patients discharged to the community.TAPS项目。22:对出院回归社区的长期住院精神科患者的五年随访。
Br J Psychiatry Suppl. 1994 Nov(25):13-7.
6
Assessment of the severity of primary depressive illness. Wakefield self-assessment depression inventory.原发性抑郁疾病严重程度评估。韦克菲尔德自评抑郁量表。
Psychol Med. 1971 Feb;1(2):143-9. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700000064.
7
Replacing the mental hospital. Community provision for a district's chronically psychiatrically disabled in domestic environments?取代精神病院。在家庭环境中为某地区慢性精神残疾者提供社区服务?
Br J Psychiatry. 1991 Jan;158:113-7. doi: 10.1192/bjp.158.1.113.