Bennett D A, Shannon K M, Beckett L A, Goetz C G, Wilson R S
Rush Alzheimer's Disease Center, Rush Institute for Healthy Aging, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Neurology. 1997 Dec;49(6):1580-7. doi: 10.1212/wnl.49.6.1580.
We evaluated the ability of nurse clinicians to assess parkinsonian signs in older persons with a modified version of the motor section of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS). After completing a structured training protocol, three nurse clinicians and a neurologist with expertise in movement disorders administered a modified UPDRS to 75 older persons. The nurses repeated the assessment about 3 weeks later. Inter-rater agreement and short-term temporal stability were estimated for each item, the total modified UPDRS score, and for summary measures of bradykinesia, postural reflex impairment, rigidity, and tremor, and a global parkinsonian sign score. We performed our assessment in Catholic religious communities in the Chicago area, using consecutive subjects at four communities participating in the Religious Orders Study, a longitudinal, clinical-pathologic study of older persons. Our results showed that nurses were not a significant source of variability, with intraclass correlations exceeding 0.97 for all items, and they showed good to excellent agreement with the neurologist for most modified UPDRS items. Correlations between nurses and neurologist exceeded 0.90 for the total modified UPDRS, ranged from 0.76 to 0.95 for the four parkinsonian domain scores, and exceeded 0.90 for the global parkinsonian sign score. Nurses showed fair to good agreement with themselves over the 3-week interval for most modified UPDRS items. Correlations over the 3-week interval exceeded 0.90 for the total modified UPDRS score, ranged from 0.70 to 0.95 for the four domain scores, and exceeded 0.90 for the global parkinsonian sign score. Ratings of parkinsonian signs by nurse clinicians corresponded closely to those of a neurologist with expertise in movement disorders and showed good inter-rater agreement and temporal stability. With appropriate training, nurse clinicians can reliably administer the modified UPDRS.
我们使用统一帕金森病评定量表(UPDRS)运动部分的修订版,评估了护士临床医生评估老年人帕金森氏体征的能力。在完成结构化培训方案后,三名护士临床医生和一名运动障碍领域的神经科医生对75名老年人进行了修订版UPDRS评估。约3周后,护士重复了评估。对每个项目、修订版UPDRS总分、运动迟缓、姿势反射障碍、僵硬和震颤的汇总指标以及整体帕金森氏体征评分,估计了评分者间一致性和短期时间稳定性。我们在芝加哥地区的天主教宗教社区进行评估,使用了参与宗教团体研究的四个社区的连续受试者,该研究是一项针对老年人的纵向临床病理研究。我们的结果表明,护士不是变异性的重要来源,所有项目的组内相关性均超过0.97,并且在大多数修订版UPDRS项目上,他们与神经科医生的一致性良好至优秀。护士与神经科医生之间,修订版UPDRS总分的相关性超过0.90,四个帕金森病领域评分的相关性在0.76至0.95之间,整体帕金森氏体征评分的相关性超过0.90。在3周的时间间隔内,大多数修订版UPDRS项目中,护士自身的一致性良好。3周时间间隔内,修订版UPDRS总分的相关性超过0.90,四个领域评分的相关性在0.70至0.95之间,整体帕金森氏体征评分的相关性超过0.90。护士临床医生对帕金森氏体征的评分与运动障碍领域的神经科医生的评分密切相关,显示出良好的评分者间一致性和时间稳定性。经过适当培训,护士临床医生能够可靠地实施修订版UPDRS。