Fishman N W, Kennard E D, Steenkiste A R, Popma J J, Baim D S, Detre K M
Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261, USA.
Am J Cardiol. 1997 Nov 20;80(10A):10K-18K. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(97)00760-1.
The New Approaches to Coronary Intervention (NACI) registry was funded in 1990 by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute to evaluate the safety and efficacy of new coronary interventional devices. The registry collected data from 39 clinical centers on 8 new devices: 3 atherectomy devices, 2 stents, 2 laser devices and the laser balloon. The original funding called for a total of 500 patients to be recruited for each device. One device (the laser balloon) was removed from use early in the recruitment period. Subsequent funding was obtained for an additional 500 patients treated with directional atherectomy, and 500 additional female patients who were recruited when the main recruitment had finished. When all recruitment was finished in March 1994, a total of 4,429 patients had been recruited. Consecutive patients treated with a new device at each clinical site were recruited regardless of underlying clinical condition or result. Patients were followed for 1 year by telephone contact at 6 weeks, 6 months and 1 year. Overall 1-year follow-up compliance was excellent at 96% of patients. The NACI database was designed to allow analysis of the complex relationships between patient, lesion and device. In particular, the mode of use of each device, the treatment order, and the outcome after each device attempt were recorded. All in-hospital clinical events were recorded as well as an assessment of the success of the procedure by the operator. The results of each telephone follow-up included any interim cardiac events, anginal status, and results of any subsequent angiograms or exercise test. Any repeat percutaneous procedures or bypass surgery on an NACI patient were recorded in the same detail as the original procedure. All data collected were subjected to extensive editing at the coordinating center to ensure both internal and external consistency. An angiographic core laboratory was also funded for NACI in 1992 to provide uniform analyses of procedural angiograms. Measurements were made at each step of the procedure, that is preprocedure, after each device use, and postprocedure. Both quantitative and qualitative measurements were made at each step using standardized definitions, enabling a complete description of the procedure to be analyzed. Angiograms were made available to the core laboratory for 89% of all initial procedures.
冠状动脉介入新方法(NACI)登记处由国家心肺血液研究所于1990年资助,旨在评估新型冠状动脉介入器械的安全性和有效性。该登记处从39个临床中心收集了8种新器械的数据:3种旋切器械、2种支架、2种激光器械和激光球囊。最初的资助要求为每种器械招募总共500名患者。一种器械(激光球囊)在招募期早期就停止使用了。随后获得了额外的资助,用于为另外500名接受定向旋切术治疗的患者以及在主要招募结束后招募的500名女性患者提供资金。当1994年3月所有招募工作完成时,总共招募了4429名患者。在每个临床地点,连续接受新器械治疗的患者被招募,无论其潜在的临床状况或结果如何。通过在6周、6个月和1年时进行电话随访,对患者进行为期1年的跟踪。总体而言,1年随访的依从性非常好,达到了96%的患者。NACI数据库旨在允许分析患者、病变和器械之间的复杂关系。特别是,记录了每种器械的使用方式、治疗顺序以及每次器械尝试后的结果。记录了所有住院临床事件以及操作者对手术成功的评估。每次电话随访的结果包括任何中期心脏事件、心绞痛状态以及任何后续血管造影或运动试验的结果。NACI患者的任何重复经皮手术或搭桥手术都与原始手术一样详细记录。在协调中心对收集到的所有数据进行了广泛编辑,以确保内部和外部的一致性。1992年还为NACI资助了一个血管造影核心实验室,以对手术血管造影进行统一分析。在手术的每个步骤,即术前、每次器械使用后和术后,都进行了测量。在每个步骤使用标准化定义进行定量和定性测量,从而能够对手术进行完整描述并进行分析。89%的所有初始手术的血管造影图像都提供给了核心实验室。