Suppr超能文献

选择性代谢型受体激动剂可区分非离子型谷氨酸结合位点。

Selective metabotropic receptor agonists distinguish non-ionotropic glutamate binding sites.

作者信息

Testa C M, Hollingsworth Z R, Shinozaki H, Penney J B, Young A B

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston 02114, USA.

出版信息

Brain Res. 1997 Oct 31;773(1-2):15-27. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(97)00818-4.

Abstract

Metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) are thought to mediate diverse processes in brain including synaptic plasticity and excitotoxicity. These receptors are often divided into three groups by their pharmacological profiles. [3H]Glutamate binding in the presence of compounds selective for ionotropic glutamate receptors can be used as a general assay for these receptors; subtypes of this non-ionotropic [3H]glutamate binding differ in both pharmacology and anatomical distribution, and are differentially sensitive to quisqualate. The characteristics of these binding sites are consistent with those of group 1 (high-affinity quisqualate) and group 2 (low-affinity quisqualate) mGluRs. Under our assay conditions, no [3H]glutamate binding to group 3-like (L-AP4 sensitive) sites could be demonstrated. We have attempted to characterize particular agents which may selectively measure [3H]glutamate binding to mGluR subtypes. We used two isomers of 2-(carboxycyclopropyl)glycine, L-CCG-I and L-CCG-II, and the (2S,1'R,2'R,3'R) isomer of 2-(2,3-dicarboxycyclopropyl)glycine (DCG-IV) as competitors of non-ionotropic [3H]glutamate binding sites. DCG-IV clearly distinguishes two binding sites. Quantitative levels of DCG-IV binding by anatomic region correlate with quisqualate-defined binding subtypes: high-affinity DCG-IV binding correlates with low-affinity quisqualate binding, whereas low-affinity DCG-IV binding correlates with high-affinity quisqualate binding. L-CCG-II displaces only one type of non-ionotropic [3H]glutamate binding, corresponding to high-affinity quisqualate binding. Therefore DCG-IV and L-CCG-II at appropriate concentrations appear to distinguish binding to putative group 2 vs. group 1 mGluRs. L-CCG-I displaces both high- and low-affinity quisqualate binding sites, but unlike the other two compounds, does not clearly distinguish between them.

摘要

代谢型谷氨酸受体(mGluRs)被认为介导大脑中的多种过程,包括突触可塑性和兴奋性毒性。这些受体通常根据其药理学特性分为三组。在存在对离子型谷氨酸受体具有选择性的化合物的情况下,[3H]谷氨酸结合可作为这些受体的通用检测方法;这种非离子型[3H]谷氨酸结合的亚型在药理学和解剖学分布上均有所不同,并且对喹啉酸的敏感性也不同。这些结合位点的特征与第1组(高亲和力喹啉酸)和第2组(低亲和力喹啉酸)mGluRs的特征一致。在我们的检测条件下,未证明有[3H]谷氨酸与第3组样(L-AP4敏感)位点结合。我们试图鉴定可能选择性测量[3H]谷氨酸与mGluR亚型结合的特定试剂。我们使用2-(羧基环丙基)甘氨酸的两种异构体L-CCG-I和L-CCG-II,以及2-(2,3-二羧基环丙基)甘氨酸(DCG-IV)的(2S,1'R,2'R,3'R)异构体作为非离子型[3H]谷氨酸结合位点的竞争者。DCG-IV清楚地区分了两个结合位点。按解剖区域划分的DCG-IV结合定量水平与喹啉酸定义的结合亚型相关:高亲和力DCG-IV结合与低亲和力喹啉酸结合相关,而低亲和力DCG-IV结合与高亲和力喹啉酸结合相关。L-CCG-II仅取代一种非离子型[3H]谷氨酸结合,对应于高亲和力喹啉酸结合。因此,适当浓度的DCG-IV和L-CCG-II似乎可以区分与假定的第2组和第1组mGluRs的结合。L-CCG-I取代高亲和力和低亲和力喹啉酸结合位点,但与其他两种化合物不同,它不能清楚地区分它们。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验