Nicula C
Clinica oftalmologică Cluj-Napoca.
Oftalmologia. 1997;41(3):213-6.
The purpose of the study is to make a comparison in the evolution of AC-IOL per primam and per secundam.
We reviewed 50 cases operated in the University Clinic of Ophthalmology from Cluj-Napoca since 1995-1996, 35 managed with primary and 15 with secondary AC-IOLs.
Early and late postoperative complications are frequently present at the primary AC-IOLs. Explanation was performed in 2 cases. The functional results were superior at secondary AC-IOLs.
AC-IOL is the solution to be chosen in case of intraoperative complication (loss of vitreous). Secondary AC-IOL is to be preferred because the postoperative complications are fewer and the functional results are better.
本研究的目的是比较一期和二期人工晶状体植入术的发展情况。
我们回顾了1995年至1996年以来在克卢日-纳波卡大学眼科诊所进行手术的50例病例，其中35例采用一期人工晶状体植入术，15例采用二期人工晶状体植入术。
一期人工晶状体植入术后早期和晚期并发症较为常见。有2例进行了解剖。二期人工晶状体植入术的功能结果更好。
在术中出现并发症（玻璃体丢失）的情况下，人工晶状体植入术是应选择的解决方案。二期人工晶状体植入术更可取，因为术后并发症较少且功能结果更好。
