Andresen R, Radmer S, Banzer D
Röntgen- und Nuklearmedizinische Abteilung des Städtischen Behringkrankenhauses Zehlendorf, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der Freien Universität, Berlin.
Aktuelle Radiol. 1997 Sep;7(5):264-9.
It should be examined how far BMD semiquantitative (profile analysis) and qualitative datas (architecture of spongy bone, age of patient) can be combined in one score in order to improve the assessment of fracture risk. SE-QCT was performed in 220 patients with a mean age of 55.8 (33-84) years from whom conventional X-ray images of the thoracic and lumbar spine were available. In the axial scans spongiosa architecture was classified and a density profile analysis was carried out. This was followed by gradation of BMD values, different types of spongiosa architecture, profile analysis and age of patient to a numerical score. This was compared to the number of fractures, whereby the patients were separated into three groups: group I = no fracture, group II = one fracture, group III = more than one fracture. The BMD values, types of spongiosa architecture, semiquantitative profile analysis can be significantly assigned to the groups I and II (p < 0.02), groups I and III (p < 0.001), and the groups II and III (p < 0.05). By combining BMD values, architecture of spongy bone, density profile analysis, and age of patients without fracture, scale 8-12 = patients with or without fracture, scale 13-16 = patients with at least one fracture [corrected].
应该研究骨密度半定量(轮廓分析)和定性数据(松质骨结构、患者年龄)在多大程度上可以合并为一个评分,以改善骨折风险评估。对220例平均年龄为55.8岁(33 - 84岁)的患者进行了脊柱电子计算机断层扫描(SE-QCT),这些患者均有胸椎和腰椎的传统X线图像。在轴向扫描中,对松质骨结构进行分类并进行密度轮廓分析。随后,对骨密度值、不同类型的松质骨结构、轮廓分析和患者年龄进行分级,得出一个数值评分。将其与骨折数量进行比较,患者被分为三组:第一组 = 无骨折,第二组 = 有一处骨折,第三组 = 有一处以上骨折。骨密度值、松质骨结构类型、半定量轮廓分析在第一组和第二组(p < 0.02)、第一组和第三组(p < 0.001)以及第二组和第三组(p < 0.05)之间有显著差异。通过合并无骨折患者的骨密度值、松质骨结构、密度轮廓分析和年龄,8 - 12分 = 有或无骨折的患者,13 - 16分 = 至少有一处骨折的患者[校正后]。