Paolillo A, Giugni E, Bozzao A, Bastianello S
Dipartimento di Scienze Neurologiche, Università, La Sapienza, Roma.
Radiol Med. 1997 Jun;93(6):686-91.
Fast spin echo (FSE) and fast fluid attenuated inversion recovery (fast-FLAIR) MR sequences were compared with conventional spin echo (CSE) in quantitating multiple sclerosis (MS) lesion burden. For each sequence, the total number and volume of MS lesions were calculated in 38 remitting MS patients using a semiautomated lesion detection program. CSE, FSE and fast-FLAIR images were reported on randomly and at different times by two expert observers. Interobserver differences, the time needed to quantitate MS lesions and lesion signal intensity (contrast-to-noise ratio and overall contrast) were considered. The lesions were classified by site into infratentorial, white matter and cortical/subcortical. A total of 2970 lesions with a volume of 961.7 cm3 was calculated on CSE images. FSE images depicted fewer (16.6%; p < .005) and smaller (24.9%; p < .0001) lesions and the differences were statistically significant. Despite an overall nonsignificant reduction for fast-FLAIR images (.5% and 4.8% for lesion number and volume, respectively), significantly lower values (lesion number: p < .01; volume: p < .04) were observed for infratentorial lesions, while significantly higher values were seen for cortical/subcortical lesions (lesion number: p < .01; volume: p < .02). A higher lesion/white matter contrast (p < .002), a significant time saving for lesion burden quantitation (p < .05) and very low interobserver variability were found in favor of fast-FLAIR. Our data suggest that, despite the limitations regarding infratentorial lesions, fast-FLAIR sequences are indicated in MS studies because of their good identification of cortical/subcortical lesions, almost complete interobserver agreement, higher contrast-to-noise ratio and the limited time needed for semiautomated quantitation.
在对多发性硬化症(MS)病变负荷进行定量分析时,将快速自旋回波(FSE)和快速液体衰减反转恢复(fast-FLAIR)磁共振序列与传统自旋回波(CSE)进行了比较。对于每个序列,使用半自动病变检测程序计算了38例缓解型MS患者的MS病变总数和体积。两名专家观察者在不同时间随机报告CSE、FSE和fast-FLAIR图像。考虑了观察者间差异、定量MS病变所需时间以及病变信号强度(对比噪声比和总体对比度)。病变按部位分为幕下、白质和皮质/皮质下。在CSE图像上共计算出2970个病变,体积为961.7 cm³。FSE图像显示的病变数量(减少16.6%;p <.005)和体积(减少24.9%;p <.0001)更少,差异具有统计学意义。尽管fast-FLAIR图像总体上减少不显著(病变数量和体积分别减少0.5%和4.8%),但幕下病变的值显著更低(病变数量:p <.01;体积:p <.04),而皮质/皮质下病变的值显著更高(病变数量:p <.01;体积:p <.02)。发现fast-FLAIR具有更高的病变/白质对比度(p <.002)、在病变负荷定量方面显著节省时间(p <.05)以及观察者间变异性非常低。我们的数据表明,尽管幕下病变存在局限性,但fast-FLAIR序列因其对皮质/皮质下病变的良好识别、几乎完全的观察者间一致性、更高的对比噪声比以及半自动定量所需的有限时间,在MS研究中是适用的。