Calderó J, Prevette D, Mei X, Oakley R A, Li L, Milligan C, Houenou L, Burek M, Oppenheim R W
Department of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Lleida, Lleida 25198, Catalonia, Spain.
J Neurosci. 1998 Jan 1;18(1):356-70. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-01-00356.1998.
Unilateral limb-bud removal (LBR) before the outgrowth of sensory or motor neurons to the leg of chick embryos was used to examine the role of limb (target)-derived signals in the development and survival of lumbar motoneurons and sensory neurons in the dorsal root ganglia (DRG). After LBR, motor and sensory neurons underwent normal initial histological differentiation, and cell growth in both populations was unaffected. Before their death, target-deprived motoneurons also expressed a cell-specific marker, the homeodomain protein islet-1. Proliferation of sensory and motor precursor cells was also unaffected by LBR, and the migration of neural crest cells to the DRG and of motoneurons into the ventral horn occurred normally. During the normal period of programmed cell death (PCD), increased numbers of both sensory and motor neurons degenerated after LBR. However, whereas motoneuron loss increased by 40-50% (90% total), only approximately 25% more sensory neurons degenerated after LBR. A significant number of the surviving sensory neurons projected to aberrant targets in the tail after LBR, and many of these were lost after ablation of both the limb and tail. Treatment with neurotrophic factors (or muscle extract) rescued sensory and motor neurons from cell death after LBR without affecting precursor proliferation of either population. Activity blockade with curare failed to rescue motoneurons after LBR, and combined treatment with curare plus muscle extract was no more effective than muscle extract alone. Treatment with the antioxidant N-acetylcysteine rescued motoneurons from normal cell death but not after LBR. Two specific inhibitors of the interleukin beta1 converting enzyme (ICE) family of cysteine proteases also failed to prevent motoneuron death after LBR. Taken together these data provide definitive evidence that the loss of spinal neurons after LBR cannot be attributed to altered proliferation, migration, or differentiation. Rather, in the absence of limb-derived trophic signals, the affected neurons fail to survive and undergo PCD. Although normal cell death and cell death after target deprivation share many features in common, the intracellular pathways of cell death in the two may be distinct.
在鸡胚腿部感觉或运动神经元长出之前进行单侧肢体芽切除(LBR),以研究肢体(靶标)衍生信号在腰运动神经元和背根神经节(DRG)中感觉神经元的发育和存活中的作用。LBR后,运动和感觉神经元经历了正常的初始组织学分化,并且两个群体中的细胞生长均未受影响。在死亡之前,缺乏靶标的运动神经元也表达了一种细胞特异性标记物,即同源结构域蛋白胰岛-1。感觉和运动前体细胞的增殖也不受LBR的影响,神经嵴细胞向DRG的迁移以及运动神经元向腹角的迁移正常发生。在正常的程序性细胞死亡(PCD)期间,LBR后感觉和运动神经元退变的数量均增加。然而,虽然运动神经元损失增加了40%-50%(总共90%),但LBR后感觉神经元退变仅增加了约25%。大量存活的感觉神经元在LBR后投射到尾巴中的异常靶标,并且在肢体和尾巴都被切除后,其中许多神经元丢失了。用神经营养因子(或肌肉提取物)处理可使LBR后的感觉和运动神经元免于细胞死亡,而不影响任何一个群体的前体细胞增殖。用箭毒进行活动阻断未能挽救LBR后的运动神经元,并且箭毒加肌肉提取物的联合处理并不比单独使用肌肉提取物更有效。用抗氧化剂N-乙酰半胱氨酸处理可使运动神经元免于正常细胞死亡,但不能挽救LBR后的运动神经元。半胱氨酸蛋白酶白细胞介素β1转换酶(ICE)家族的两种特异性抑制剂也未能预防LBR后的运动神经元死亡。这些数据综合起来提供了确凿的证据,表明LBR后脊髓神经元的损失不能归因于增殖、迁移或分化的改变。相反,在缺乏肢体衍生的营养信号的情况下,受影响的神经元无法存活并经历PCD。尽管正常细胞死亡和靶标剥夺后的细胞死亡有许多共同特征,但两者细胞死亡的细胞内途径可能不同。