Suppr超能文献

评估护理学本科学生的批判性思维能力。

Evaluating critical thinking skills of baccalaureate nursing students.

作者信息

Vaughan-Wrobel B C, O'Sullivan P, Smith L

机构信息

University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, College of Nursing, Little Rock 72205, USA.

出版信息

J Nurs Educ. 1997 Dec;36(10):485-8. doi: 10.3928/0148-4834-19971201-09.

Abstract

This study evaluates the critical thinking skills of students enrolled in a baccalaureate nursing program, using the WGCTA, for the classes of 1993 through 1996. Scores were obtained at entry and at end of junior and senior years. The mean entry WGCTA score was 56 for all four classes; however, the 1995 and 1996 classes had significantly higher scores than the class of 1994. Critical thinking scores were higher at entry for older students and students who had completed another education degree; however, critical thinking scores were lower for students who had previous nursing experience. After adapting for age, previous degree, and nursing experience, no significant differences in the WGCTA scores from entry to end of junior and senior years emerged for the classes of 1993, 1994, 1995. Critical thinking skills have become the hallmark of education. The National Education Goal Panel has advocated for an increase in the ability to think critically, communicate effectively and solve problems (Banta, 1993). In turn, the nursing profession has incorporated these goals of higher education into its educational programs. The National League for Nursing (NLN) includes the measurement of critical thinking as a required outcome in the evaluation and accreditation of baccalaureate and higher degree programs in nursing. This critical thinking outcome must reflect the student's skill in analysis, reasoning, research, or decision making as these skills relate to the nursing discipline (National League for Nursing, 1992). To meet the NLN's critical thinking outcome criterion, nursing programs must have a method of evaluating this skill. Many programs use the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal (WGCTA), which is a standardized instrument. The College of Nursing at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS) adopted this instrument to evaluate the critical thinking skills of students in the baccalaureate nursing program.

摘要

本研究使用沃森-格拉泽批判性思维评估量表(WGCTA),对1993年至1996年入读护理学学士学位课程的学生的批判性思维技能进行了评估。在入学时以及大三和大四结束时获取分数。所有四个班级的入学平均WGCTA分数均为56分;然而,1995年和1996年班级的分数显著高于1994年班级。年龄较大的学生以及已完成其他教育学位的学生在入学时的批判性思维分数较高;然而,有过护理经验的学生的批判性思维分数较低。在对年龄、先前学位和护理经验进行调整后,1993年、1994年、1995年班级从入学到大三和大四结束时的WGCTA分数没有显著差异。批判性思维技能已成为教育的标志。国家教育目标小组主张提高批判性思维、有效沟通和解决问题的能力(班塔,1993年)。相应地,护理专业已将这些高等教育目标纳入其教育计划中。美国国家护理联盟(NLN)将批判性思维的测评作为护理学士学位及更高学位课程评估和认证的一项必要成果。这一批判性思维成果必须反映学生在分析、推理、研究或决策方面的技能,因为这些技能与护理学科相关(美国国家护理联盟,1992年)。为了达到NLN的批判性思维成果标准,护理课程必须有一种评估该技能的方法。许多课程使用沃森-格拉泽批判性思维评估量表(WGCTA),这是一种标准化工具。阿肯色大学医学科学学院护理学院(UAMS)采用该工具来评估护理学学士学位课程学生的批判性思维技能。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验