Suppr超能文献

四种护理专业项目中高年级护生的护理临床决策技能与一般批判性思维能力之间的关系。

The relationship between clinical decision-making skills in nursing and general critical thinking abilities of senior nursing students in four types of nursing programs.

作者信息

Brooks K L, Shepherd J M

机构信息

Millersville University, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

J Nurs Educ. 1990 Nov;29(9):391-9. doi: 10.3928/0148-4834-19901101-05.

Abstract

This descriptive study was undertaken to investigate the relationship between clinical decision-making skills in nursing and critical thinking abilities of senior nursing students in four types of nursing education programs: generic baccalaureate, associate, and diploma--the basic RN programs, along with the upper division baccalaureate (specifically RN completion) program. Fifty senior students from each type of program were conveniently selected. Clinical decision-making in nursing was measured by the Nursing Performance Simulation Instrument. General critical thinking abilities were determined by the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal. Among the basic RN programs, the higher level of general critical thinking ability was attained by generic baccalaureate seniors (mean score, 61.3) compared with the associate (50.0) and diploma (51.3) seniors. The clinical decision-making scores in nursing skills were virtually identical for the three basic programs--generic (32.2), associate (32.2), and diploma (32.3). That is, mean performance scores of the 2-year associate degree, 3-year diploma, and 4-year generic baccalaureate degree students on the Nursing Performance Simulation Instrument showed no statistically significant difference. The mean critical thinking score for the upper division baccalaureate seniors (61.1) was comparable to that of the generic baccalaureate seniors. Clinical decision-making mean score for the upper division seniors was significantly higher (38.0) than those of the other three groups. A weak though significant positive correlation (r = 0.249) between clinical decision-making and critical thinking across all four types of programs was found.

摘要

本描述性研究旨在调查四种护理教育项目中,高级护理专业学生的护理临床决策技能与批判性思维能力之间的关系。这四种项目分别是:普通学士学位、护理学副学士学位、文凭课程(即基础注册护士项目)以及高等学士学位课程(特别是注册护士完成课程)。从每种项目中方便地选取了50名高年级学生。护理临床决策通过护理绩效模拟工具进行测量。一般批判性思维能力由沃森-格拉泽批判性思维评估确定。在基础注册护士项目中,普通学士学位高年级学生(平均得分61.3)的一般批判性思维能力水平高于护理学副学士学位(50.0)和文凭课程(51.3)的高年级学生。三种基础项目在护理技能方面的临床决策得分几乎相同——普通学士学位(32.2)、护理学副学士学位(32.2)和文凭课程(32.3)。也就是说,两年制护理学副学士学位、三年制文凭课程和四年制普通学士学位课程的学生在护理绩效模拟工具上的平均成绩得分没有统计学上的显著差异。高等学士学位高年级学生的批判性思维平均得分(61.1)与普通学士学位高年级学生相当。高等学士学位高年级学生的临床决策平均得分(38.0)显著高于其他三组。在所有四种项目类型中,临床决策与批判性思维之间发现了微弱但显著的正相关(r = 0.249)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验