Perry A, Stafford S L, Scheithauer B W, Suman V J, Lohse C M
Department of Anatomic Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
Am J Surg Pathol. 1997 Dec;21(12):1455-65. doi: 10.1097/00000478-199712000-00008.
Histologic grading of meningiomas has prognostic and sometimes therapeutic implications, but diagnostic criteria for atypical meningioma are vague, and the significance of brain invasion in the determination of malignancy remains controversial. We reviewed our experience with 581 patients whose meningiomas were resected at Mayo Clinic during the years 1978 through 1988. All patients were followed until death or a median of 9.0 years. Ten histologic parameters were assessed and compared with recurrence-free survival. On univariate analysis, six variables were associated with recurrence, although most were statistically significant only in the subset of patients having undergone gross total tumor resection. On multivariate analyses, the most significant parameters were histologic brain invasion (when assessable) and maximal mitotic rate of at least four per 10 high-power fields (HPF). Also significant were combinations of at least three of the following four parameters: hypercellularity, architectural sheeting, macronucleoli, and small cell formation. Proposed grading criteria based on these findings yielded 81% classic, 15% atypical, and 4% brain invasive meningiomas with respective 5-year recurrence rates of 12%, 41%, and 56%. There was no association between histologic grade and either extent of surgical resection or patient age. However, male sex was associated with high-grade (atypical/brain invasive) tumors. Too few frankly anaplastic meningiomas were encountered for statistical analysis. Brain invasion and an increased mitotic index (at least four per 10 HPF) are the most powerful histologic factors prognostic for recurrence in meningiomas. We propose an objective definition for atypical meningioma based on our data. Because the difference in recurrence rates for brain invasive and atypical meningiomas was not statistically significant, it could not be determined whether brain invasion alone warrants a designation of malignancy. Likewise, we were unable to determine what constitutes histologic anaplasia due to the rarity of such cases.
脑膜瘤的组织学分级具有预后意义,有时还具有治疗意义,但非典型脑膜瘤的诊断标准尚不明确,且脑侵犯在恶性程度判定中的意义仍存在争议。我们回顾了1978年至1988年间在梅奥诊所接受脑膜瘤切除术的581例患者的治疗经验。所有患者均随访至死亡或中位随访9.0年。评估了10个组织学参数,并与无复发生存率进行比较。单因素分析显示,6个变量与复发相关,尽管大多数仅在接受肿瘤全切的患者亚组中具有统计学意义。多因素分析显示,最显著的参数是组织学脑侵犯(若可评估)和每10个高倍视野至少有4个有丝分裂象。以下4个参数中至少3个参数的组合也具有显著性:细胞增多、片状结构、大核仁和小细胞形成。基于这些发现提出的分级标准显示,经典型脑膜瘤占81%,非典型脑膜瘤占15%,脑侵犯型脑膜瘤占4%,其5年复发率分别为12%、41%和56%。组织学分级与手术切除范围或患者年龄均无关联。然而,男性与高级别(非典型/脑侵犯型)肿瘤相关。因遇到的明显间变性脑膜瘤太少,无法进行统计学分析。脑侵犯和有丝分裂指数增加(每10个高倍视野至少4个)是脑膜瘤复发最有力的组织学预后因素。我们基于数据提出了非典型脑膜瘤的客观定义。由于脑侵犯型和非典型脑膜瘤的复发率差异无统计学意义,因此无法确定仅脑侵犯是否就足以判定为恶性。同样,由于此类病例罕见,我们无法确定组织学间变的构成要素。