Feder J, Lambrew J, Huckaby M
Institute for Health Care Research and Policy, Georgetown University, USA.
Milbank Q. 1997;75(4):425-59. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.00065.
Because it absorbs about a third of Medicaid spending, long-term care would be affected by any major changes in the financing or structure of this federal–state program. Analysis of the implications for long-term care of the Medicaid restructuring proposals that Congress considered in the 1995–96 federal budget debate leads to this conclusion: the fiscal pressure and incentives that would be created by fixed dollar or block grants, or by limits on federal spending per beneficiary (per capita caps), when combined with enhanced state flexibility in program design, could significantly hinder service choice and quality, reduce access to care, and increase out-of-pocket payments by Medicaid beneficiaries or their families.
由于长期护理支出约占医疗补助计划支出的三分之一,因此该联邦-州联合计划在融资或结构上的任何重大变化都会对长期护理产生影响。对国会在1995-1996年联邦预算辩论中审议的医疗补助计划重组提案对长期护理的影响进行分析后得出以下结论:固定金额拨款、整笔拨款或对每位受益人的联邦支出设限(人均限额)所产生的财政压力和激励措施,再加上各州在项目设计上更大的灵活性,可能会严重阻碍服务选择和质量,减少获得护理的机会,并增加医疗补助计划受益人或其家庭的自付费用。