长期护理迷宫指南。
A guide through the maze of long-term care.
作者信息
Kane R L, kane R A
出版信息
West J Med. 1981 Dec;135(6):503-10.
Abstract
Complicated requirements regarding eligibility and coverage as well as variations in the availability of programs confuse even the most diligent physicians trying to advise elderly patients about health care services. Nevertheless, awareness of such government and community resources is critical because physicians play an essential role in assisting the elderly to receive maximum health care benefits, particularly during long-term illness.
摘要
关于资格和覆盖范围的复杂要求以及项目可用性的差异，即使是最勤勉的医生在试图向老年患者提供医疗保健服务建议时也会感到困惑。然而，了解这些政府和社区资源至关重要，因为医生在帮助老年人获得最大医疗保健福利方面发挥着重要作用，尤其是在长期患病期间。
相似文献
1
A guide through the maze of long-term care.长期护理迷宫指南。
West J Med. 1981 Dec;135(6):503-10.
2
TRICARE; sub-acute care program; uniform skilled nursing facility benefit; home health care benefit; adopting Medicare payment methods for skilled nursing facilities and home health care providers. Final rule.军人医疗保健计划（TRICARE）；亚急性护理计划；统一的专业护理机构福利；家庭医疗保健福利；采用医疗保险对专业护理机构和家庭医疗保健提供者的支付方式。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2005 Oct 24;70(204):61368-79.
3
Long-term care: funding and insurance. End-of-year issue brief.长期护理：资金与保险。年终问题简报。
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv. 2009 Jan 5:1-24.
4
Long-term home health care: what are the costs of care and costs of failure to give care?长期居家医疗护理：护理成本及未提供护理的代价有哪些？
J Long Term Home Health Care. 1996 Winter;15(1):30-46.
5
Medicaid reimbursement.医疗补助报销
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv. 2012 Jan 3:1-58.
6
Long-term care: funding of long-term care. Issue brief.长期护理：长期护理的资金筹集。问题简报。
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv. 2012 Dec 31:1-46.
7
Comparison of resource utilization for Medicaid dementia patients using nursing homes versus home and community based waivers for long-term care.使用养老院与基于家庭和社区的豁免计划为医疗补助痴呆症患者提供长期护理的资源利用情况比较。
Med Care. 2008 Apr;46(4):449-53. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181621eae.
8
Long-term care: funding of long-term care.长期护理：长期护理的资金筹集
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv. 2013:1-67.
9
The Impact of Certificate-of-Need Laws on Nursing Home and Home Health Care Expenditures.需求证明法对疗养院和家庭医疗保健支出的影响。
Med Care Res Rev. 2016 Feb;73(1):85-105. doi: 10.1177/1077558715597161. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
10
A review of federal home-care legislation.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1990 Sep;38(9):1041-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1990.tb04432.x.
引用本文的文献
本文引用的文献
1
Beyond the GAO Cleveland study: client selection for home care services.
Home Health Care Serv Q. 1980 Fall;1(3):65-83.
2
Toward a continuum of care for the elderly: a note of caution.
Public Policy. 1981 Summer;29(3):331-40.
3
Short- and long-term residents of nursing homes.养老院的短期和长期居住者。
Med Care. 1981 Mar;19(3):363-70. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198103000-00011.
4
The 4 per cent fallacy: a methodological and empirical critique of extended care facility population statistics.
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 1973 Winter;4(1):15-21. doi: 10.2190/28NK-ENPJ-M7PT-GKTK.
5
On being sane in insane places.身处疯人院而心智健全
Science. 1973 Jan 19;179(4070):250-8. doi: 10.1126/science.179.4070.250.
6
Total chance of institutionalization among the aged.
Gerontologist. 1976 Dec;16(6):504-7. doi: 10.1093/geront/16.6.504.
7
The risk of institutionalization before death.死亡前被收容机构收容的风险。
Gerontologist. 1979 Aug;19(4):361-7. doi: 10.1093/geront/19.4.361.
8
Care of the aged: old problems in need of new solutions.
Science. 1978 May 26;200(4344):913-9. doi: 10.1126/science.417403.
Zotero 插件