Torgerson D J, Reid D M
National Primary Care Research & Development Centre, University of York, York, USA.
QJM. 1997 Oct;90(10):649-52. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/90.10.649.
A number of criteria have been postulated that a screening test should fulfill in order for it to be a good or worthwhile screening tool. However, it is a rare test which fulfills all the criteria that have been thought to be important. Therefore, there always exists some form of trade-off between, for example, the detection rate and the false-positive rate and cost. It is the magnitude and form of these trade-offs, which differ for each screening test, that are important, not whether a test fulfills some arbitrary set of criteria. In this paper, we describe some of the trade-offs which occur when appraising a screening test and we argue that listing arbitrary criteria is an unhelpful activity.
为了成为一个好的或有价值的筛查工具,人们假定了一些筛查试验应满足的标准。然而,很少有试验能满足所有被认为重要的标准。因此,例如在检测率与假阳性率及成本之间总是存在某种形式的权衡。对于每个筛查试验而言,这些权衡的程度和形式各不相同,这才是重要的,而不是一个试验是否满足某组任意设定的标准。在本文中,我们描述了评估筛查试验时出现的一些权衡,并认为列出任意标准是一项无益的活动。