Suppr超能文献

住院患者开始使用抗心律失常药物治疗室上性心动过速的成本效益

Cost effectiveness of inpatient initiation of antiarrhythmic therapy for supraventricular tachycardias.

作者信息

Simons G R, Eisenstein E L, Shaw L J, Mark D B, Pritchett E L

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 1997 Dec 15;80(12):1551-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(97)00773-x.

Abstract

This study assessed the cost effectiveness of inpatient antiarrhythmic therapy initiation for supraventricular tachycardias using a metaanalysis of proarrhythmic risk and a decision analysis that compared inpatient to outpatient therapy initiation. A MEDLINE search of trials of antiarrhythmic therapy for supraventricular tachycardias was performed, and episodes of cardiac arrest, sudden or unexplained death, syncope, and sustained or unstable ventricular arrhythmias were recorded. A weighted average event rate, by sample size, was calculated and applied to a clinical decision model of therapy initiation in which patients were either hospitalized for 72 hours or treated as outpatients. Fifty-seven drug trials involving 2,822 patients met study criteria. Based on a 72-hour weighted average event rate of 0.63% (95% confidence interval, 0.2% to 1.2%), inpatient therapy initiation cost $19,231 per year of life saved for a 60-year-old patient with a normal life expectancy. Hospitalization remained cost effective when event rates and life expectancies were varied to model hypothetical clinical scenarios. For example, cost-effectiveness ratios for a 40-year-old without structural heart disease and a 60-year-old with structural heart disease were $37,510 and $33,310, respectively, per year of life saved. Thus, a 72-hour hospitalization for antiarrhythmic therapy initiation is cost effective for most patients with supraventricular tachycardias.

摘要

本研究通过对致心律失常风险进行荟萃分析以及比较住院起始治疗与门诊起始治疗的决策分析,评估了住院起始抗心律失常治疗对室上性心动过速的成本效益。对MEDLINE中有关室上性心动过速抗心律失常治疗的试验进行了检索,并记录了心脏骤停、猝死或不明原因死亡、晕厥以及持续性或不稳定室性心律失常的发作情况。根据样本量计算加权平均事件发生率,并将其应用于治疗起始的临床决策模型,其中患者要么住院72小时,要么作为门诊患者接受治疗。57项涉及2822例患者的药物试验符合研究标准。基于72小时加权平均事件发生率0.63%(95%置信区间,0.2%至1.2%),对于预期寿命正常的60岁患者,住院起始治疗每挽救一年生命的成本为19,231美元。当改变事件发生率和预期寿命以模拟假设的临床情景时,住院治疗仍然具有成本效益。例如,对于无结构性心脏病的40岁患者和有结构性心脏病的60岁患者,每挽救一年生命的成本效益比分别为37,510美元和33,310美元。因此,对于大多数室上性心动过速患者,住院72小时起始抗心律失常治疗具有成本效益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验