• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[CT血管造影在动脉闭塞性疾病中的应用:三种成像技术的比较]

[CT angiography in arterial occlusive disease: comparison of 3 rendering techniques].

作者信息

Rieker O, Mildenberger P, Neufang A, von Zitzewitz H, Schweden F, Thelen M

机构信息

Klinik für Radiologie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz.

出版信息

Rofo. 1997 Oct;167(4):361-70. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1015545.

DOI:10.1055/s-2007-1015545
PMID:9417264
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate different rendering techniques of CT data for the assessment of long vessel segments in peripheral vascular occlusive disease.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

40 CT angiograms (aortoiliac: n = 20, leg arteries: n = 20) were viewed using three different rendering techniques: 1, maximum intensity projection (MIP); 2, volume rendering (VR); 3, shaded surface display (SSD). CT angiograms were obtained in 6 or 8 projections. Axial cross-section images were analysed using an interactive cine mode. Intraarterial DSA was the standard in all cases.

RESULTS

The sensitivities for the diagnosis of occlusive disease were 100% (cross-section images), 94% (MIP), 91% (VR) and 93% (SSD). The specificities were 100%, 99%, 99% and 99%, respectively. For the accurate grading of high-grade (> 75%) stenoses, the sensitivities were 85% (cross-section images), 62% (MIP), 44% (VR) and 35% (SSD). Specificity was 99% for all techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

CTA is accurate in occlusive disease. Interactive viewing of cross-section images is the most accurate technique. MIP is superior to VR in the imaging of high-grade stenoses because contrast-to-noise ratio is high and thresholding is not necessary.

摘要

目的

评估CT数据的不同渲染技术,用于外周血管闭塞性疾病中长血管段的评估。

材料与方法

使用三种不同的渲染技术查看40例CT血管造影(腹主动脉-髂动脉:n = 20,腿部动脉:n = 20):1,最大密度投影(MIP);2,容积再现(VR);3,表面阴影显示(SSD)。CT血管造影以6或8个投影获得。使用交互式电影模式分析轴向横截面图像。所有病例均以动脉内数字减影血管造影(DSA)为标准。

结果

闭塞性疾病诊断的敏感性分别为100%(横截面图像)、94%(MIP)、91%(VR)和93%(SSD)。特异性分别为100%、99%、99%和99%。对于高级别(>75%)狭窄的准确分级,敏感性分别为85%(横截面图像)、62%(MIP)、44%(VR)和35%(SSD)。所有技术的特异性均为99%。

结论

CT血管造影(CTA)在闭塞性疾病中是准确的。交互式查看横截面图像是最准确的技术。在高级别狭窄的成像中,MIP优于VR,因为对比噪声比高且无需阈值处理。

相似文献

1
[CT angiography in arterial occlusive disease: comparison of 3 rendering techniques].[CT血管造影在动脉闭塞性疾病中的应用:三种成像技术的比较]
Rofo. 1997 Oct;167(4):361-70. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1015545.
2
Prospective comparison of CT angiography of the legs with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography.腿部CT血管造影与动脉内数字减影血管造影的前瞻性比较。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996 Feb;166(2):269-76. doi: 10.2214/ajr.166.2.8553929.
3
Multislice spiral CT angiography in peripheral arterial occlusive disease: a valuable tool in detecting significant arterial lumen narrowing?多层螺旋CT血管造影术在外周动脉闭塞性疾病中的应用:检测动脉管腔显著狭窄的有效工具?
Eur Radiol. 2004 Sep;14(9):1681-7. doi: 10.1007/s00330-004-2289-1. Epub 2004 Apr 28.
4
Assessment of peripheral arterial occlusive disease: comparison of multislice-CT angiography (MS-CTA) and intraarterial digital subtraction angiography (IA-DSA).外周动脉闭塞性疾病的评估:多层螺旋CT血管造影(MS-CTA)与动脉内数字减影血管造影(IA-DSA)的比较。
Eur J Med Res. 2003 Sep 29;8(9):389-96.
5
CT angiography versus intraarterial digital subtraction angiography for assessment of aortoiliac occlusive disease.CT血管造影与动脉内数字减影血管造影在评估主髂动脉闭塞性疾病中的比较。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997 Oct;169(4):1133-8. doi: 10.2214/ajr.169.4.9308477.
6
Four-detector row computed tomographic angiography in the evaluation of infrarenal aorta and peripheral arterial occlusive disease: influence of contrast medium concentration.四排探测器计算机断层血管造影术在评估肾下腹主动脉和周围动脉闭塞性疾病中的应用:造影剂浓度的影响
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2008 Sep-Oct;32(5):690-6. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181576cfd.
7
Multidetector row CT angiography of the lower limb arteries: a prospective comparison of volume-rendered techniques and intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography.下肢动脉多层螺旋CT血管造影:容积再现技术与动脉内数字减影血管造影的前瞻性比较
Clin Radiol. 2005 Jan;60(1):85-95. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2004.07.011.
8
Semitransparent volume-rendering CT angiography for lesion display in aortoiliac arteriosclerotic disease.用于显示主髂动脉硬化疾病病变的半透明容积再现CT血管造影术。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003 Aug;14(8):1023-30. doi: 10.1097/01.rvi.0000082860.05622.f1.
9
Carotid bifurcation CT angiography: assessment of interactive volume rendering.颈动脉分叉部CT血管造影:交互式容积再现技术的评估
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1999 Jul-Aug;23(4):590-6. doi: 10.1097/00004728-199907000-00020.
10
CT angiography: in vitro comparison of five reconstruction methods.CT血管造影术:五种重建方法的体外比较
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001 Nov;177(5):1171-6. doi: 10.2214/ajr.177.5.1771171.

引用本文的文献

1
Multislice spiral CT angiography in peripheral arterial occlusive disease: a valuable tool in detecting significant arterial lumen narrowing?多层螺旋CT血管造影术在外周动脉闭塞性疾病中的应用:检测动脉管腔显著狭窄的有效工具?
Eur Radiol. 2004 Sep;14(9):1681-7. doi: 10.1007/s00330-004-2289-1. Epub 2004 Apr 28.