Kjaerheim K
Institutt for epidemiologisk kreftforskning, Oslo.
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1997 Oct 30;117(26):3771-6.
In order to demonstrate how possible causal relationships are critically evaluated in epidemiologic research, literature on the association between alcohol and breast cancer is reviewed and discussed. A cause can be defined as a factor which, in combination with other factors, known and unknown, is sufficient to produce an effect. Since the hypothesis-generating study was published in 1977, a total of 34 positive and 16 negative studies have been published. Methodological problems, such as chance, bias and confounding, cannot be considered as plausible explanations for the above majority of positive findings. The question of causality was then evaluated using the guidelines developed by Bradford Hill in 1965. Among these, the strength of the association, consistency, temporality, biological gradient and biological plausibility, are the most important. In spite of the relatively weak association and somewhat inconsistent results, it is concluded that alcohol consumption should be considered as a cause of breast cancer. It is estimated that in Norway, between 24 and 180 cases of breast cancer may be attributed to alcohol consumption. Future research should focus on the question of effect-modification and on the possible implications of different patterns of alcohol consumption.
为了说明在流行病学研究中如何严格评估可能的因果关系,本文对酒精与乳腺癌关联的文献进行了回顾和讨论。原因可定义为与其他已知和未知因素共同作用足以产生某种效应的一个因素。自1977年发表产生假设的研究以来,共发表了34项阳性研究和16项阴性研究。诸如机遇、偏倚和混杂等方法学问题,不能被视为对上述大多数阳性结果的合理的解释。随后使用布拉德福德·希尔于1965年制定的指南对因果关系问题进行了评估。其中,关联强度、一致性、时间顺序、生物学梯度和生物学合理性最为重要。尽管关联相对较弱且结果有些不一致,但得出的结论是,饮酒应被视为乳腺癌的一个病因。据估计,在挪威,24至180例乳腺癌病例可能归因于饮酒。未来的研究应关注效应修饰问题以及不同饮酒模式可能产生的影响。