• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Portland Retail Druggists Association vs Abbott Laboratories et al, part 2.

作者信息

Greenberg R B, Mandl F L

出版信息

Am J Hosp Pharm. 1976 Jul;33(7):648-51.

PMID:941919
Abstract

The ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court in Abbot Laboratories et al vs Portland Retail Druggists Association is discussed as it relates to hospital pharmacy purchasing practices. Topics covered include: the applicability of the Robinson-Patman Act and its Section 13C exemption to various types of hospitals; definitions of "former patient" and "reasonable quantity"; and recordkeeping requirements. It is concluded that the Portland case should not deter expansion or innovation in health care delivery and ambulatory care services but must be accounted for in implementing new programs.

摘要

相似文献

1
Portland Retail Druggists Association vs Abbott Laboratories et al, part 2.
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1976 Jul;33(7):648-51.
2
Portland Retail Druggists Association vs Abbott Laboratories et al, part 1.波特兰零售药剂师协会诉雅培实验室等,第1部分
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1976 Jun;33(6):572-3.
3
Robinson-Patman update: De Modena v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan.《罗宾逊-帕特曼法案》最新情况:德莫德纳诉凯撒基金会健康计划案
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1985 Jul;42(7):1572-4.
4
U.S. Supreme Court decision in Jefferson County Pharmaceutical Association v. Abbott Laboratories et al.
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1983 Sep;40(9):1537-8.
5
Legal implications of home health care by nonprofit hospitals.
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1986 Feb;43(2):386-91.
6
Differential pricing of pharmaceuticals and retail competition under the Robinson-Patman Act.《罗宾逊-帕特曼法案》下药品的差别定价与零售竞争
Am J Law Med. 1985;11(3):293-317.
7
Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.“婴儿多伊”事件重演?美国卫生与公众服务部及2002年《出生时存活婴儿保护法》:关于规范新生儿医疗行为的警示
Pediatrics. 2005 Oct;116(4):e576-85. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1590.
8
American hospital pharmacy from the Colonial period to the 1930s.从殖民时期到20世纪30年代的美国医院药学。
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1994 Nov 15;51(22):2817-23.
9
Abortion foes get turn to ask Supreme Court for constitutional protection.堕胎反对者转而向最高法院寻求宪法保护。
Sun. 1994 Apr 28:10A.
10
Legal implications of hospital resales of pharmaceuticals. American Hospital Association Office of General Counsel.
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1986 Aug;43(8):1951-7.