Ramírez J L, Torronteras R, Castaño J P, Sánchez-Hormigo A, Garrido J C, García-Navarro S, Gracia-Navarro F
Department of Cell Biology, University of Córdoba, Spain.
J Neuroendocrinol. 1997 Nov;9(11):841-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2826.1997.00650.x.
Previous results from our laboratory demonstrated the existence of two subpopulations of porcine somatotropes of low- (LD) and high density (HD) that exhibit differences in ultrastructure and respond in an opposite manner to somatostatin (SRIF) in vitro. In LD cells, SRIF did not affect basal growth hormone (GH) release but partially blocked the stimulatory effect induced by GH-releasing factor (GRF). Conversely, SRIF paradoxically stimulated the secretory activity of HD somatotropes. Here, we have analysed in detail the basic parameters that characterize this differential response. To this end, the time- and dose-dependent effects of SRIF-14 were evaluated on separate monolayer cultures of both subpopulations. Likewise, the direct effect of the peptide on individual somatotropes from each subset was assessed by cell immunoblot assay. Finally, we compared the effects of SRIF-14 and SRIF-28 on cultures of LD and HD cells. SRIF-14 (10(-7) M) induced a rapid (30 min) and sustained (4 h) 2-fold increase in GH release from HD cells, whereas it did not affect GH secretion from LD somatotropes. Surprisingly, a low dose of SRIF (10(-15) M) stimulated GH release from both LD (154.1 +/- 8.2% of basal, P < 0.05) and HD (337.2 +/- 55.5% of basal, P < 0.05) subpopulations, even more effectively than higher doses of the peptide. Results from cell blotting showed that SRIF stimulatory effects were exerted directly upon individual somatotropes. Finally, SRIF-28 elicited similar responses to those observed for SRIF-14 in both somatotrope subpopulations, yet 10(-15) M SRIF-28 was less potent than the same dose of SRIF-14 in stimulating GH release from HD cells. Our present findings demonstrate that SRIF can function as a true GH-releasing factor in cultures of porcine pituitary cells by acting specifically and directly upon somatotropes. Furthermore, together with previous observations, these results strongly suggest that SRIF is not merely an inhibitor of GH release in pigs, but might play a dual modulatory role. Heterogeneity of the somatotrope population contributes greatly to this divergent effect of SRIF.
我们实验室之前的研究结果表明,猪生长激素细胞存在低密度(LD)和高密度(HD)两个亚群,它们在超微结构上存在差异,并且在体外对生长抑素(SRIF)的反应相反。在LD细胞中,SRIF不影响基础生长激素(GH)的释放,但部分阻断了生长激素释放因子(GRF)诱导的刺激作用。相反,SRIF反常地刺激了HD生长激素细胞的分泌活性。在此,我们详细分析了表征这种差异反应的基本参数。为此,评估了SRIF - 14对两个亚群单独单层培养物的时间和剂量依赖性影响。同样,通过细胞免疫印迹分析评估了该肽对每个亚群中单个生长激素细胞的直接作用。最后,我们比较了SRIF - 14和SRIF - 28对LD和HD细胞培养物的影响。SRIF - 14(10^(-7) M)诱导HD细胞中GH释放迅速(30分钟)且持续(4小时)增加2倍,而它不影响LD生长激素细胞的GH分泌。令人惊讶的是,低剂量的SRIF(10^(-15) M)刺激了LD(基础值的154.1±8.2%,P < 0.05)和HD(基础值的337.2±55.5%,P < 0.05)亚群的GH释放,甚至比更高剂量的该肽更有效。细胞印迹结果表明,SRIF的刺激作用直接作用于单个生长激素细胞。最后,SRIF - 28在两个生长激素细胞亚群中引发了与SRIF - 14观察到的类似反应,但10^(-15) M SRIF - 28在刺激HD细胞GH释放方面的效力低于相同剂量的SRIF - 14。我们目前的研究结果表明,SRIF通过特异性地直接作用于生长激素细胞,可在猪垂体细胞培养物中作为真正的GH释放因子发挥作用。此外,与先前的观察结果一起,这些结果强烈表明,SRIF在猪中不仅是GH释放的抑制剂,而且可能发挥双重调节作用。生长激素细胞群体的异质性极大地促成了SRIF的这种不同作用。