Clark D A
Department of Psychology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, Canada.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1997 Dec;65(6):996-1000. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.65.6.996.
This commentary examines a number of methodological and conceptual issues that were raised in this special section on cognitive assessment. Although progress has been made in a number of areas since cognitive-clinical researchers first addressed the assessment of cognition almost 20 years ago, important conceptual and methodological questions still remain unresolved. These include questions about the validity of retrospective self-report questionnaires of cognition, the low convergent validity between different assessment methods, and the failure to specify the range of generalizability of specific cognition measures. Further advances in cognitive assessment will depend on a more concerted research focus on the methodological and conceptual issues raised in this special section.
本评论探讨了在这个关于认知评估的特别版块中所提出的一些方法学和概念性问题。尽管自从认知临床研究者大约20年前首次着手认知评估以来,在许多领域已经取得了进展,但重要的概念性和方法学问题仍然没有得到解决。这些问题包括关于认知回顾性自我报告问卷的有效性问题、不同评估方法之间较低的聚合效度,以及未能明确特定认知测量的可推广范围。认知评估的进一步进展将取决于对这个特别版块中所提出的方法学和概念性问题进行更协调一致的研究关注。