Wackers F J
Cardiovascular Nuclear Imaging Laboratory, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520-8042, USA.
J Nucl Cardiol. 1994 Mar-Apr;1(2 Pt 1):180-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02984090.
A confusing multitude of different myocardial perfusion imaging protocols have been proposed during the last few years. The impetus for this development was new insights in imaging with thallium 201 and the challenge to perform efficient imaging with the newly developed technetium 99m-labeled imaging agents. The practicing nuclear cardiologist is confronted with a true maze of options. This review describes in detail the various protocols, discusses advantages and disadvantages of each, and states, when appropriate, the personal preference of the author.
在过去几年里,人们提出了大量令人困惑的不同心肌灌注成像方案。这一发展的动力来自于对铊201成像的新认识,以及使用新开发的锝99m标记成像剂进行高效成像的挑战。执业核心脏病专家面临着一个真正的选择迷宫。这篇综述详细描述了各种方案,讨论了每种方案的优缺点,并在适当的时候陈述了作者的个人偏好。