NaBadalung D P, Powers J M, Connelly M E
University of Washington School of Dentistry, Seattle, USA.
J Prosthet Dent. 1997 Dec;78(6):566-73. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(97)70007-6.
In vitro bond strengths of a traditional denture base resin (Lucitone 199) and three adhesive denture base resins (Meta-Dent, Meta-Fast with liner, and Meta-Fast without liner) to treated nickel-chromium-beryllium (Ni-Cr-Be) partial denture alloy were tested with four alloy surface pretreatments (sandblast, Met-etch, Rocatec with silane, and Rocatec without silane), with or without primer (Dentsply). The Lucitone 199 resin bonded to the nonprimed sandblasted group was the control group. The hypothesis was the use of alloy pretreatments and/or primer does not improve the bond strength of denture base resins to sandblasted Ni-Cr-Be partial denture alloy.
Primed and nonprimed bonded specimens were prepared and finished, stored in 37 degrees C distilled water for 24 hours, then debonded in tension on a testing machine. The bond strength was calculated in megapascals (MPa). Five specimens were prepared and tested for each experimental condition, both with and without primer, for a total of 160 specimens.
For three-way analysis of variance, the main effects of resins and treatment were statistically significant (p < 0.05), but the main effect of primer was not statistically significantly (p > 0.05). Without primer, the control group had the lowest bond strength (0 MPa). The three adhesive resin groups produced significantly higher bond strengths than the Lucitone resin groups. For the treated groups, nearly all sandblasted groups produced significantly lower bond strength than the other three treated groups. Meta-Dent to Met-etch treated group had the highest bond strength (23.9 MPa). With primer, the bond strengths of the Lucitone resin groups were significantly higher than the nonprimed groups, and the Lucitone resin-primed Rocatec treated group had the highest bond strength (14.8 MPa). For the three adhesive denture base resins, nearly all primed treated groups had significantly lower bond strengths than nonprimed groups.
Without primer, the Lucitone resin-sandblast treated group (control) had the lowest bond strength (0 MPa). The Meta-Dent denture base resin with the Met-etch treated group had the highest bond strength (23.9 MPa). With primer, the Lucitone resin-primed Rocatec-silane treated group had the highest bond strength (14.8 MPa). For the adhesive denture base resins, nearly all bond strengths of the primed treated groups were significantly lower than the values of the nonprimed groups.
测试一种传统义齿基托树脂(Lucitone 199)和三种粘结性义齿基托树脂(Meta - Dent、带衬层的Meta - Fast和不带衬层的Meta - Fast)与经过处理的镍铬铍(Ni - Cr - Be)局部义齿合金之间的体外粘结强度,该合金进行了四种表面预处理(喷砂、Met - 蚀刻、含硅烷的Rocatec处理和不含硅烷的Rocatec处理),并使用或不使用底漆(登士柏)。Lucitone 199树脂与未使用底漆的喷砂处理组作为对照组。假设是合金预处理和/或底漆的使用不会提高义齿基托树脂与喷砂处理的Ni - Cr - Be局部义齿合金之间的粘结强度。
制备并完成使用底漆和未使用底漆的粘结试件,在37℃蒸馏水中储存24小时,然后在测试机上进行拉伸脱粘。粘结强度以兆帕(MPa)计算。针对每种实验条件,制备并测试5个试件,包括使用底漆和未使用底漆的情况,总共160个试件。
对于三因素方差分析,树脂和处理的主效应具有统计学意义(p < 0.05),但底漆的主效应无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。不使用底漆时,对照组的粘结强度最低(0 MPa)。三种粘结性树脂组产生的粘结强度明显高于Lucitone树脂组。对于处理组,几乎所有喷砂处理组的粘结强度均明显低于其他三种处理组。Meta - Dent与Met - 蚀刻处理组的粘结强度最高(23.9 MPa)。使用底漆时,Lucitone树脂组的粘结强度明显高于未使用底漆的组,且Lucitone树脂 - 使用底漆的Rocatec处理组的粘结强度最高(14.8 MPa)。对于三种粘结性义齿基托树脂,几乎所有使用底漆的处理组的粘结强度均明显低于未使用底漆的组。
不使用底漆时,Lucitone树脂 - 喷砂处理组(对照组)的粘结强度最低(0 MPa)。Meta - Dent义齿基托树脂与Met -蚀刻处理组的粘结强度最高(23.9 MPa)。使用底漆时,Lucitone树脂 - 使用底漆的Rocatec - 硅烷处理组的粘结强度最高(14.8 MPa)。对于粘结性义齿基托树脂,几乎所有使用底漆的处理组的粘结强度均明显低于未使用底漆组的数值。