Effects of volatile anaesthetics on spontaneous action potential firing of cerebellar Purkinje cells in vitro do not follow the Meyer-Overton rule.

We have investigated in rat brain slices the effects of the volatile anaesthetics enflurane, isoflurane and halothane on spontaneous discharge patterns and mean firing rates of cerebellar Purkinje cells. In the absence of these anaesthetics, Purkinje cells fired bursts of action potentials separated by quiescent periods lasting less than 2 s. Mean discharge rates were 10.8 (SEM 0.4) Hz at 23 +/- 1 degrees C and 25.6 (1.2) Hz at 35 +/- 1 degrees C. The agents exhibited qualitatively different effects when applied at concentrations corresponding to 1-3 MAC. Enflurane markedly lengthened burst and inter-burst durations. Isoflurane acted in a similar manner, but effects were less pronounced. In contrast with isoflurane and enflurane, halothane shortened burst durations. At concentrations corresponding to 1-1.5 MAC, halothane, isoflurane and enflurane significantly depressed action potential firing by 15-30% (P < 0.05). Enflurane 1.2 mmol litre-1 (2.0 MAC), isoflurane 0.9 mmol litre-1 (2.8 MAC) and halothane 0.9 mmol litre-1 (3.8 MAC) depressed spontaneous spike rates by 50%. The changes in discharge patterns and the concentration-dependent decrease in the firing rates were similar at 23 +/- 1 degrees C and 35 +/- 1 degrees C. In summary, we observed that neither the anaesthetic-induced alterations in spontaneous discharge patterns nor the EC50 values of the concentration-dependent depression of the mean firing rates were in accordance with the Meyer-Overton rule. However, at clinically relevant concentrations, depression of average spike rates did not differ significantly between the anaesthetics and thus followed the rule. Our results suggest that anaesthetic actions, which are in accordance with the rule, are frequently masked by several side effects.