• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

V区屈肌腱的活动范围:主动与被动屈曲活动方案的比较

The range of excursion of flexor tendons in Zone V: a comparison of active vs passive flexion mobilisation regimes.

作者信息

Panchal J, Mehdi S, O'Donoghue J M, O'Sullivan S T, O'Shaughnessy M, O'Connor T P

机构信息

Department of Plastic Surgery, Cork University Hospital, Ireland.

出版信息

Br J Plast Surg. 1997 Oct;50(7):517-22. doi: 10.1016/s0007-1226(97)91300-x.

DOI:10.1016/s0007-1226(97)91300-x
PMID:9422949
Abstract

A number of early postoperative mobilisation regimes have been developed in an attempt to increase tendon excursion and gliding and thereby reduce formation of adhesions following repair of flexor tendons. Early active flexion mobilisation regimes are becoming more popular, and have replaced early passive flexion regimes in many centres. The aim of the present study was: (a) to determine the range of excursion of flexor tendons in Zone V, and (b) to compare the excursion ranges between active (Belfast) and passive (modified Duran) flexion mobilisation regimes postoperatively. This was done (a) in two cadavers, and (b) in two patients intraoperatively, and postoperatively at 10 days, 3 weeks and 6 weeks. With passive flexion, the mean tendon excursion in Zone V in cadavers was 1 mm for flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS), flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) and flexor pollicis longus (FPL) tendons respectively. With simulated active flexion, the mean tendon excursion was 14 mm, 10 mm and 11 mm respectively. The mean tendon excursion in clinical cases intraoperatively following passive flexion was 2 mm for FDS, FDP and FPL respectively; following simulated active flexion it was 10 mm, 11 mm and 11 mm for FDS, FDP and FPL respectively. On the tenth day following repair, the mean excursions of FDS, FDP and FPL were 1 mm, 4 mm and 4 mm on passive flexion as compared to 3 mm, 10 mm and 12 mm on active flexion respectively. Three weeks postoperatively, the mean excursions of FDS, FDP and FPL tendons were 1 mm, 2 mm and 1 mm on passive flexion as compared to 5 mm, 15 mm on active flexion respectively. Six weeks postoperatively, the mean excursions of FDS, FDP and FPL tendons were 9 mm, 7 mm and 4 mm on passive flexion as compared to 12 mm, 33 mm and 20 mm on active flexion respectively. These results demonstrate an increased excursion of repaired flexor tendons in Zone V following an active flexion mobilisation regime as compared to a passive flexion mobilisation regime.

摘要

为了增加肌腱的移动和滑动,从而减少屈指肌腱修复术后粘连的形成,人们制定了多种早期术后活动方案。早期主动屈曲活动方案越来越受欢迎,在许多中心已取代了早期被动屈曲方案。本研究的目的是:(a)确定V区屈指肌腱的移动范围,(b)比较术后主动(贝尔法斯特)和被动(改良杜兰)屈曲活动方案的移动范围。这一研究通过以下方式进行:(a)在两具尸体上,(b)在两名患者术中以及术后第10天、3周和6周进行。被动屈曲时,尸体V区指浅屈肌(FDS)、指深屈肌(FDP)和拇长屈肌(FPL)肌腱的平均肌腱移动分别为1毫米。模拟主动屈曲时,平均肌腱移动分别为14毫米、10毫米和11毫米。临床病例中,被动屈曲后术中FDS、FDP和FPL的平均肌腱移动分别为2毫米;模拟主动屈曲后,FDS、FDP和FPL分别为10毫米、11毫米和11毫米。修复后第10天,被动屈曲时FDS、FDP和FPL的平均移动分别为1毫米、4毫米和4毫米,而主动屈曲时分别为3毫米、10毫米和12毫米。术后3周,被动屈曲时FDS、FDP和FPL肌腱的平均移动分别为小1毫米、2毫米和1毫米,主动屈曲时分别为5毫米、15毫米。术后6周,被动屈曲时FDS、FDP和FPL肌腱的平均移动分别为9毫米、7毫米和4毫米,主动屈曲时分别为12毫米、33毫米和20毫米。这些结果表明,与被动屈曲活动方案相比,主动屈曲活动方案后V区修复的屈指肌腱移动增加。

相似文献

1
The range of excursion of flexor tendons in Zone V: a comparison of active vs passive flexion mobilisation regimes.V区屈肌腱的活动范围:主动与被动屈曲活动方案的比较
Br J Plast Surg. 1997 Oct;50(7):517-22. doi: 10.1016/s0007-1226(97)91300-x.
2
Flexor Tendon Lacerations屈肌腱撕裂伤
3
Work of flexion related to different suture materials after flexor digitorum profundus and flexor digitorum superficialis tendon repair in zone II: a biomechanical study.II区指深屈肌腱和指浅屈肌腱修复后不同缝合材料相关的屈肌工作:一项生物力学研究
J Hand Surg Am. 2009 Apr;34(4):700-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.12.003.
4
Flexor digitorum superficialis repair outside the A2 pulley after zone II laceration: gliding and bowstringing.II区撕裂伤后在A2滑车外修复指浅屈肌:滑动与弓弦状畸形
J Hand Surg Am. 2015 Apr;40(4):653-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.12.045. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
5
Ultrasonographic assessment in vivo of the excursion and tension of flexor digitorum profundus tendon on different rehabilitation protocols after tendon repair.肌腱修复后不同康复方案下指深屈肌腱活动度和张力的超声体内评估
J Hand Ther. 2022 Oct-Dec;35(4):516-522. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2021.01.006. Epub 2021 Jan 26.
6
Zone 2 Flexor Tendon Repair Location and Risk of Catching on the A2 Pulley.区域 2 屈肌腱修复位置与 A2 滑车处卡压风险。
J Hand Surg Am. 2020 Aug;45(8):775.e1-775.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2020.01.004. Epub 2020 May 12.
7
Impact of flexor digitorum superficialis on gliding function of the flexor digitorum profundus according to regions in zone II.根据II区不同区域探讨指浅屈肌对指深屈肌滑动功能的影响。
J Hand Surg Am. 2003 Sep;28(5):838-44. doi: 10.1016/s0363-5023(03)00300-9.
8
Effects of superficialis tendon repairs on lacerated profundus tendons within or proximal to the A2 pulley: an in vivo study in chickens.浅肌腱修复对A2滑车内或其近端的指深屈肌腱裂伤的影响:一项鸡体内研究
J Hand Surg Am. 2003 Nov;28(6):994-1001. doi: 10.1016/s0363-5023(03)00428-3.
9
Zone I flexor tendon rehabilitation with limited extension and active flexion.I区屈肌腱康复,伴伸展受限和主动屈曲。
J Hand Ther. 2005 Apr-Jun;18(2):128-40. doi: 10.1197/j.jht.2005.03.001.
10
Ultrasonographic assessment of long finger tendon excursion in zone v during passive and active tendon gliding exercises.被动和主动肌腱滑动练习过程中超声评估Ⅴ区手指长肌腱的滑动情况。
J Hand Surg Am. 2010 Apr;35(4):559-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.01.010. Epub 2010 Mar 12.

引用本文的文献

1
A protocol for randomized controlled trial on early active flexion versus passive flexion mobilization therapy for Spaghetti wrist injuries.一项关于意大利面条腕损伤早期主动屈曲与被动屈曲活动疗法的随机对照试验方案。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 May 24;20(1):506. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05884-z.
2
Pathomechanics and Management of Secondary Complications Associated with Tendon Adhesions Following Flexor Tendon Repair in Zone II.II区屈指肌腱修复术后肌腱粘连相关继发并发症的发病机制与处理
J Hand Microsurg. 2016 Aug;8(2):70-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1586173. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
3
Ultrasonographic assessment of flexor tendon mobilization: effect of different protocols on tendon excursion.
超声评估屈肌腱活动度:不同方案对肌腱活动度的影响。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Mar 7;94(5):394-402. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01521.