• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

严格遵守标本标记政策可降低血库标本血型错误的发生率。

Adherence to a strict specimen-labeling policy decreases the incidence of erroneous blood grouping of blood bank specimens.

作者信息

Lumadue J A, Boyd J S, Ness P M

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Transfusion. 1997 Nov-Dec;37(11-12):1169-72. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1997.37111298088047.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1537-2995.1997.37111298088047.x
PMID:9426641
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To assess the effectiveness of a system of preventing incompatible blood transfusions resulting from the misidentification of patient specimens, a prospective analysis of all blood samples submitted to a laboratory was performed.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Incorrectly labeled specimens (rejected samples) were tested for ABO and Rh type, and routine antibody screens were performed. Test results were compared to historic patient data or patient data obtained from subsequently submitted (correctly) labeled specimens. For comparison, all discrepant serologic results from appropriately labeled samples were also recorded.

RESULTS

Specimens that failed to meet the criteria for specimen acceptance were 40 times more likely to have a blood grouping discrepancy.

CONCLUSION

Strict adherence to the labeling requirements results in a significant decrease in erroneous blood grouping. This would accordingly diminish the likelihood of transfusing out-of-group blood components.

摘要

背景

为评估一个预防因患者标本误识别导致的不相容输血系统的有效性,对提交至某实验室的所有血样进行了前瞻性分析。

研究设计与方法

对标签错误的标本(拒收样本)进行ABO和Rh血型检测,并进行常规抗体筛查。将检测结果与历史患者数据或从随后提交的(正确)标签标本中获得的患者数据进行比较。为作比较,还记录了来自标签正确样本的所有不一致血清学结果。

结果

不符合标本验收标准的标本出现血型不符的可能性高40倍。

结论

严格遵守标签要求可显著减少血型错误。这相应地会降低输注不相合血液成分的可能性。

相似文献

1
Adherence to a strict specimen-labeling policy decreases the incidence of erroneous blood grouping of blood bank specimens.严格遵守标本标记政策可降低血库标本血型错误的发生率。
Transfusion. 1997 Nov-Dec;37(11-12):1169-72. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1997.37111298088047.x.
2
The suitability of hemolyzed specimens for compatibility testing using automated technology.使用自动化技术进行相容性检测时溶血标本的适用性。
Transfusion. 2008 Aug;48(8):1713-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2008.01741.x. Epub 2008 May 14.
3
Validation of a hospital-laboratory workstation for immunohematologic methods.免疫血液学方法的医院-实验室工作站验证。
Transfusion. 2010 Jan;50(1):26-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2009.02359.x. Epub 2009 Aug 26.
4
Multicentre evaluation of Erytra Eflexis®, a benchtop fully automated analyser with a compact design for routine use in blood transfusion laboratory.Erytra Eflexis®的多中心评估,这是一款台式全自动分析仪,设计紧凑,适用于输血实验室的常规使用。
Transfus Med. 2019 Dec;29(6):401-407. doi: 10.1111/tme.12619. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
5
[Results of a blood group serological general test in the city of Halle].[哈雷市血型血清学常规检测结果]
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena). 1979 Aug 1;73(15):743-5.
6
[The gel centrifugation test in serologic compatibility testing].[血清相容性检测中的凝胶离心试验]
Beitr Infusionsther. 1990;26:358-61.
7
The 1987 Comprehensive Blood Bank Survey of the College of American Pathologists.
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1989 Sep;113(9):969-74.
8
Comparison of two platelet transfusion strategies to minimize ABO-nonidentical transfusion, outdating, and shortages using a computer-simulated "virtual blood bank".使用计算机模拟的“虚拟血库”比较两种血小板输注策略,以尽量减少ABO血型不匹配输血、过期和短缺情况。
Transfusion. 2015 Feb;55(2):348-56. doi: 10.1111/trf.12831. Epub 2014 Sep 1.
9
Electronic verification of donor-recipient compatibility: the computer crossmatch.供体-受体相容性的电子验证:计算机交叉配型
Transfusion. 1994 Feb;34(2):105-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1994.34294143935.x.
10
A severe haemolytic transfusion reaction caused by anti-Le(a) active at 37 °C.由在37℃具有活性的抗Le(a)引起的严重溶血性输血反应。
Blood Transfus. 2013 Jul;11(3):456-9. doi: 10.2450/2012.0180-12. Epub 2012 Dec 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of Laboratory Practices to Reducing Patient Misidentification Due to Specimen Labeling Errors at the Time of Specimen Collection in Healthcare Settings: LMBP™ Systematic Review.医疗机构标本采集时实验室操作对减少因标本标签错误导致的患者身份误认的有效性:LMBP™系统评价
J Appl Lab Med. 2017 Sep;2(2):244-258. doi: 10.1373/jalm.2017.023762.
2
The role of comprehensive check at the blood bank reception on blood requisitions in detecting potential transfusion errors.血库接收处对用血申请进行全面检查在检测潜在输血错误方面的作用。
Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2015 Jun;31(2):269-74. doi: 10.1007/s12288-014-0444-7. Epub 2014 Aug 17.
3
Quality standards and samples in genetic testing.
遗传检测中的质量标准和样本。
J Clin Pathol. 2012 May;65(5):389-93. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2011-200519. Epub 2012 Jan 18.
4
Serious hazards of transfusion (SHOT) initiative: analysis of the first two annual reports.输血严重危害(SHOT)倡议:头两份年度报告分析
BMJ. 1999 Jul 3;319(7201):16-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7201.16.