Esquenazi S
Centro Oftalmologico OLSABE, Bogota, Colombia.
J Refract Surg. 1997 Nov-Dec;13(7):637-43. doi: 10.3928/1081-597X-19971101-10.
Automated lamellar keratoplasty (ALK) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) are surgical procedures used to correct high myopia, although their differences in effectiveness and long-term stability have not been sufficiently documented. Little information exists about the results of the two procedures in the hands of the same surgeon.
To assess long-term stability of refractive results of ALK and LASIK, a retrospective study of 260 eyes that received ALK and 308 eyes that received LASIK was undertaken. The mean follow-up was 1.8 years for ALK and 1.4 years for LASIK.
The mean baseline spherical equivalent refraction in ALK eyes was -14.30 +/- 2.05 D (range -5 to -25 D) and in LASIK eyes was -8.50 +/- 1.75 D (range -3 to -26 D). At 3 months after surgery, 65 ALK eyes (25%) were within +/- 1.00 D of intended correction compared with 269 LASIK eyes (87.5%). At 1 year, only 31 ALK eyes (16%) were within +/- 1.00 D of intended correction, compared with 224 eyes (82%) in the LASIK group. At 3 months after surgery, the mean spherical equivalent refraction was -2.64 D in ALK eyes; at 1 year it was -4.60 D, and at 2 years it increased to -5.50 D. In contrast, the mean spherical equivalent refraction in the LASIK eyes at 3 months after surgery was -0.22 D and remained nearly stable until 1.5 years after surgery, when it was -0.50 D. More regression occurred when a large amount of corneal stromal tissue was removed. One out of four eyes that had more than 25% of its corneal tissue removed lost correction after 6 months for both ALK and LASIK. No ALK or LASIK eyes with a remaining corneal thickness of 310 microns or more had regression of the refractive result after 6 months.
Both ALK and LASIK can reduce moderate and high myopia. The safety and long-term stability of LASIK is better than that for ALK. Although both procedures take advantage of lamellar keratoplasty techniques, the LASIK technique minimizes the depth of ablation while maximizing optical zone size which results in more accurate correction and better long-term stability, the latter depending primarily on the amount of corneal stromal tissue removed.
自动板层角膜成形术(ALK)和准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)是用于矫正高度近视的外科手术,尽管它们在有效性和长期稳定性方面的差异尚未得到充分记录。关于同一位外科医生实施这两种手术的结果,相关信息较少。
为评估ALK和LASIK屈光结果的长期稳定性,对260只接受ALK手术的眼睛和308只接受LASIK手术的眼睛进行了一项回顾性研究。ALK组的平均随访时间为1.8年,LASIK组为1.4年。
ALK组眼睛的平均基线等效球镜度为-14.30±2.05D(范围-5至-25D),LASIK组眼睛为-8.50±1.75D(范围-3至-26D)。术后3个月时,65只ALK眼睛(25%)的屈光矫正误差在±1.00D以内,而LASIK组有269只眼睛(87.5%)达到该标准。1年时,ALK组只有31只眼睛(16%)的屈光矫正误差在±1.00D以内,而LASIK组有224只眼睛(82%)达到该标准。术后3个月时,ALK组眼睛的平均等效球镜度为-2.64D;1年时为-4.60D,2年时增至-5.50D。相比之下,LASIK组眼睛术后3个月时的平均等效球镜度为-0.22D,直到术后1.5年一直保持相对稳定,此时为-0.50D。当切除大量角膜基质组织时,屈光回退更为明显。对于ALK和LASIK手术,四分之一角膜组织切除量超过25%的眼睛在6个月后出现了矫正丢失。剩余角膜厚度为310微米或更厚的ALK或LASIK眼睛在6个月后均未出现屈光结果的回退。
ALK和LASIK均可降低中度和高度近视。LASIK的安全性和长期稳定性优于ALK。尽管两种手术均采用了板层角膜成形术技术,但LASIK技术将消融深度降至最低,同时将光学区尺寸最大化,从而实现更精确的矫正和更好的长期稳定性,长期稳定性主要取决于切除的角膜基质组织量。