Greil A L
Division of Social Sciences, Alfred University, NY 14802, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 1997 Dec;45(11):1679-704. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(97)00102-0.
This essay reviews the literature on the social psychological impact of infertility, paying special attention to the relationship between gender and the infertility experience. It is convenient to divide the literature into articles which explore the possibility that infertility may have psychological causes (Psychogenic Hypothesis) and those which examine the psychological consequences of infertility (Psychological Consequences Hypothesis). The psychogenic hypothesis is now rejected by most researchers, but a related hypothesis, which states that stress may be a causal factor in infertility, is worthy of exploration. The descriptive literature on the psychological consequences of infertility presents infertility as a devastating experience, especially for women. Attempts to test the psychological consequences hypothesis have produced more equivocal results. In general, studies which look for psychopathology have not found significant differences between the infertile and others. Studies which employ measures of stress and self-esteem have found significant differences. The psychological consequences literature is characterized by a number of flaws, including over sampling of women, small sample size, non-representative samples, failure to study those who have not sought treatment, primitive statistical techniques, and an over-reliance on self-reports. Studies on infertility and psychological distress need to take into consideration both the duration of infertility and the duration of treatment. Finding an appropriate set of "controls" is a particularly intractable problem for this area of research. In general, the psychological distress literature shows little regard for the social construction of infertility. By taking what should be understood as a characteristic of a social situation and transforming it into an individual trait, the literature presents what is essentially a medical model of the psycho-social impact of infertility. Most researchers conclude that infertility is a more stressful experience for women than it is for men. Most studies have found that the relationship between gender and infertility distress is not affected by which partner has the reproductive impairment. Future research needs to be better informed by theoretical considerations. Scholars need to pay more attention to the way the experience of infertility is conditioned by social structural realities. New ways need to be developed for better taking into account the processual nature of the infertility experience. Efforts need to be make to include under-studied portions of the infertile population. Finally, more effort needs to be made to better integrate the empirical study of the experience of infertility with important social policy questions.
本文回顾了关于不孕症社会心理影响的文献,特别关注性别与不孕经历之间的关系。将文献分为两类较为方便,一类探讨不孕症可能存在心理原因的可能性(心理成因假说),另一类研究不孕症的心理后果(心理后果假说)。如今,大多数研究人员已摒弃心理成因假说,但一个相关假说,即压力可能是不孕症的一个因果因素,值得探讨。关于不孕症心理后果的描述性文献将不孕视为一种极具毁灭性的经历,对女性而言尤甚。检验心理后果假说的尝试得出了更为模棱两可的结果。总体而言,寻找精神病理学特征的研究并未发现不孕者与其他人之间存在显著差异。采用压力和自尊测量方法的研究则发现了显著差异。关于心理后果的文献存在诸多缺陷,包括女性样本过多、样本量小、样本缺乏代表性、未研究未寻求治疗者、统计技术原始以及过度依赖自我报告。关于不孕症与心理困扰的研究需要考虑不孕持续时间和治疗持续时间。对于该研究领域而言,找到合适的“对照组”是一个特别棘手的问题。总体而言,心理困扰方面的文献很少关注不孕症的社会建构。通过将本应理解为社会状况特征的内容转化为个体特质,该文献呈现出的本质上是不孕症心理社会影响的医学模式。大多数研究人员得出结论,不孕症对女性而言比对男性更具压力。大多数研究发现,性别与不孕困扰之间的关系不受生殖功能受损的是哪一方伴侣影响。未来的研究需要在理论考量方面有更充分的依据。学者们需要更多关注不孕经历如何受到社会结构现实的制约。需要开发新方法,以便更好地考虑不孕经历的过程性本质。需要努力纳入研究不足的不孕人群部分。最后,需要做出更多努力,以便更好地将不孕经历的实证研究与重要的社会政策问题相结合。