Suppr超能文献

用于测定血液透析充分性的血样采集差异。肾脏营养委员会国家研究问题协作研究组。

Variation in blood sample collection for determination of hemodialysis adequacy. Council on Renal Nutrition National Research Question Collaborative Study Group.

作者信息

Beto J A, Bansal V K, Ing T S, Daugirdas J T

机构信息

Collaborative Study Data Coordinating Center, Loyola University Medical Center, Division of Renal Disease and Hypertension, Maywood, IL 60153, USA.

出版信息

Am J Kidney Dis. 1998 Jan;31(1):135-41. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.1998.v31.pm9428465.

Abstract

Inadequate dialysis has been associated with high morbidity and mortality in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis. The accurate estimation of dialysis adequacy, measured either as a calculated urea kinetics (Kt/V) or a simple urea reduction ratio (URR) is dependent on the proper collection of blood samples for predialysis and postdialysis blood urea nitrogen (BUN) determination. Because no established protocol exists for blood sampling, we surveyed the study cohort of dialysis centers participating in the National Kidney Foundation Council on Renal Nutrition National Research Question Collaborative Study to determine the comparability of BUN data that were collected to calculate URR to determine adequacy of dialysis. Surveys were completed by 100% of the 202 units participating: 195 in the United States (from 43 states) and seven from Canada, treating approximately 15,000 hemodialysis patients in total. The distribution of the sample by the type of facility mirrored that of 1996 United States Renal Data System (USRDS) Annual Report facilities data. Results showed a 5.0% error in predialysis blood draw and an 8.4% to 41.6% error in the postdialysis counterpart. There was a large variability in the observed postdialysis methods in general. Dilution of predialysis sample with either heparin or saline will falsely underestimate Kt/V and URR. The presence of access-derived, recirculated blood in the postdialysis sample will falsely overestimate Kt/V and URR. Excessive delay in drawing postdialysis sample will reduce Kt/V and URR because of urea rebound. Adoption by all dialysis providers of a uniform blood sample draw procedure will result in a consistency necessary to allow reliable and valid comparison of adequacy of dialysis parameters within and between ESRD patients, units, and clinical trials.

摘要

在接受维持性血液透析的终末期肾病(ESRD)患者中,透析不充分与高发病率和高死亡率相关。透析充分性的准确评估,无论是通过计算尿素动力学(Kt/V)还是简单的尿素清除率(URR)来衡量,都取决于为透析前和透析后血尿素氮(BUN)测定正确采集血样。由于不存在既定的血样采集方案,我们对参与美国国家肾脏基金会肾脏营养委员会国家研究问题协作研究的透析中心研究队列进行了调查,以确定为计算URR而收集的BUN数据的可比性,从而确定透析的充分性。参与的202个单位中有100%完成了调查:美国有195个(来自43个州),加拿大有7个,总共治疗了约15000名血液透析患者。按机构类型划分的样本分布与1996年美国肾脏数据系统(USRDS)年度报告中的机构数据分布情况相似。结果显示,透析前采血存在5.0%的误差,透析后采血的误差为8.4%至41.6%。总体而言,观察到的透析后方法存在很大差异。用肝素或生理盐水稀释透析前样本会错误地低估Kt/V和URR。透析后样本中存在来自通路的再循环血液会错误地高估Kt/V和URR。透析后采血过度延迟会因尿素反弹而降低Kt/V和URR。所有透析提供者采用统一的血样采集程序将产生一致性,这对于在ESRD患者、单位和临床试验内部及之间可靠且有效地比较透析参数的充分性是必要的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验