• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

婴儿临床风险指数的测量特性——可靠性、12小时后的有效性以及7天内的反应性。

Measurement properties of the Clinical Risk Index for Babies--reliabilty, validity beyond the first 12 hours, and responsiveness over 7 days.

作者信息

Fowlie P W, Gould C R, Tarnow-Mordi W O, Strang D

机构信息

Department of Child Health, University of Dundee, UK.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 1998 Jan;26(1):163-8. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199801000-00033.

DOI:10.1097/00003246-199801000-00033
PMID:9428560
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Clinical Risk Index for Babies (CRIB) is a simple instrument used to measure clinical risk and illness severity in very low birth-weight infants. We assessed its reliability, validity beyond the first 12 hrs after birth, and responsiveness to individual change in condition after 7 days.

DESIGN

Cohort study.

SETTING

Three tertiary and three nontertiary UK hospitals.

PATIENTS

Three hundred ninety-eight infants whose birth weight was <1501 g or who were born before a 31-wk gestation period.

INTERVENTIONS

Inter- and intrarater reliability of data extraction were assessed by Pearson and intraclass correlation. To validate CRIB, we tested the correlation between clinical risk and illness severity with the risk of: a) death; b) prolonged treatment with supplemental oxygen; and c) disability at 2 yrs. Logistic regression models were fitted to assess validity and responsiveness.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Reliability coefficients ranged from 0.76 (95% confidence interval, 0.71 to 0.81) to 0.97 (0.94 to 1.00). Throughout the first week, CRIB correlated with the risk of death (p < .001), prolonged treatment with oxygen (p < .001), and disability (p < .001 to p = .033). Improved condition, represented by a reduction in CRIB within the first week, was independently associated with lower risks of each adverse outcome, p < .05.

CONCLUSIONS

During the first week, CRIB was reliable, valid, and responsive. These properties support the use of CRIB in the stratification of infants by risk and illness severity in cohort studies, and they also indicate that CRIB may have the potential to be used in other ways in the future.

摘要

目的

婴儿临床风险指数(CRIB)是一种用于测量极低出生体重儿临床风险和疾病严重程度的简易工具。我们评估了其可靠性、出生后12小时后的有效性以及7天后对个体病情变化的反应性。

设计

队列研究。

地点

英国的三家三级医院和三家非三级医院。

患者

398名出生体重<1501克或孕周<31周的婴儿。

干预措施

通过Pearson相关系数和组内相关系数评估数据提取的评分者间和评分者内可靠性。为验证CRIB,我们测试了临床风险和疾病严重程度与以下风险之间的相关性:a)死亡;b)长期补充氧气治疗;c)2岁时的残疾情况。采用逻辑回归模型评估有效性和反应性。

测量指标及主要结果

可靠性系数范围为0.76(95%置信区间,0.71至0.81)至0.97(0.94至1.00)。在第一周内,CRIB与死亡风险(p<.001)、长期氧气治疗风险(p<.001)和残疾风险(p<.001至p=.033)相关。第一周内CRIB降低代表病情改善,与各不良结局风险降低独立相关,p<.05。

结论

在第一周内,CRIB可靠、有效且具有反应性。这些特性支持在队列研究中使用CRIB对婴儿进行风险和疾病严重程度分层,也表明CRIB未来可能有其他用途。

相似文献

1
Measurement properties of the Clinical Risk Index for Babies--reliabilty, validity beyond the first 12 hours, and responsiveness over 7 days.婴儿临床风险指数的测量特性——可靠性、12小时后的有效性以及7天内的反应性。
Crit Care Med. 1998 Jan;26(1):163-8. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199801000-00033.
2
The CRIB (clinical risk index for babies) score: a tool for assessing initial neonatal risk and comparing performance of neonatal intensive care units. The International Neonatal Network.CRIB(婴儿临床风险指数)评分:一种评估新生儿初始风险及比较新生儿重症监护病房绩效的工具。国际新生儿网络。
Lancet. 1993 Jul 24;342(8865):193-8.
3
Evaluating illness severity for very low birth weight infants: CRIB or CRIB-II?评估极低出生体重儿的疾病严重程度:CRIB评分还是CRIB-II评分?
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2005 Apr;17(4):257-60. doi: 10.1080/14767050500072557.
4
The Clinical Risk Index for Babies II for Prediction of Time-Dependent Mortality and Short-Term Morbidities in Very Low Birth Weight Infants.临床婴儿风险指数 II 预测极低出生体重儿时间依赖死亡率和短期并发症的价值。
Neonatology. 2019;116(3):244-251. doi: 10.1159/000500270. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
5
The use of CRIB (clinical risk index for babies) score in auditing the performance of one neonatal intensive care unit.使用CRIB(婴儿临床风险指数)评分来评估一个新生儿重症监护病房的绩效。
Acta Paediatr. 1998 Feb;87(2):195-200. doi: 10.1080/08035259850157660.
6
The CRIB (Clinical Risk Index for Babies) score and neurodevelopmental impairment at one year corrected age in very low birth weight infants.极低出生体重儿的CRIB(婴儿临床风险指数)评分及矫正年龄一岁时的神经发育障碍
Intensive Care Med. 2000 Mar;26(3):325-9. doi: 10.1007/s001340051157.
7
[Using the CRIB as an early prognostic index for very low birthweight infants, treated in neonatal intensive care unites].[将CRIB作为极低出生体重儿在新生儿重症监护病房接受治疗的早期预后指标]
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia). 2007;46 Suppl 1:66-73.
8
Auditing Neonatal Intensive Care: Is PREM a Good Alternative to CRIB for Mortality Risk Adjustment in Premature Infants?新生儿重症监护审计:对于早产儿死亡率风险调整而言,早产风险评估(PREM)是新生儿重症监护风险指数(CRIB)的良好替代方法吗?
Neonatology. 2015;108(3):172-8. doi: 10.1159/000433414. Epub 2015 Jul 31.
9
An illness severity score and neonatal mortality in retrieved neonates.
Eur J Pediatr. 2004 Jul;163(7):385-9. doi: 10.1007/s00431-004-1451-8. Epub 2004 Apr 16.
10
Histologic chorioamnionitis and severity of illness in very low birth weight newborns.极低出生体重新生儿的组织学绒毛膜羊膜炎与疾病严重程度
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2005 May;6(3):298-302. doi: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000160658.35437.65.

引用本文的文献

1
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Listening Visits for Mothers of Hospitalized Newborns.一项针对住院新生儿母亲的倾听探访的随机对照试验。
Nurs Res. 2023;72(3):229-235. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000650. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
2
Predicting the Neurodevelopmental Outcome in Extremely Preterm Newborns Using a Multimodal Prognostic Model Including Brain Function Information.使用包含脑功能信息的多模态预后模型预测极早产儿的神经发育结局。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e231590. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.1590.
3
Vital signs as physiomarkers of neonatal sepsis.
生命体征作为新生儿败血症的生理标志物。
Pediatr Res. 2022 Jan;91(2):273-282. doi: 10.1038/s41390-021-01709-x. Epub 2021 Sep 7.
4
Predicting the outcomes of preterm neonates beyond the neonatal intensive care unit: What are we missing?预测新生儿重症监护病房之外早产儿的结局:我们遗漏了什么?
Pediatr Res. 2021 Feb;89(3):426-445. doi: 10.1038/s41390-020-0968-5. Epub 2020 May 19.
5
Clinical prediction models for bronchopulmonary dysplasia: a systematic review and external validation study.临床预测模型在支气管肺发育不良中的应用:系统评价和外部验证研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2013 Dec 17;13:207. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-13-207.
6
Incorporation of physiological trend and interaction effects in neonatal severity of illness scores: an experiment using a variant of the Richardson score.将生理趋势和交互作用纳入新生儿疾病严重程度评分:一项使用理查森评分变体的实验
Intensive Care Med. 2007 Sep;33(9):1602-8. doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0714-z. Epub 2007 Jun 19.
7
Neonatal disease severity scoring systems.新生儿疾病严重程度评分系统。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005 Jan;90(1):F11-6. doi: 10.1136/adc.2003.048488.
8
Assessing mortality risk in very low birthweight infants: a comparison of CRIB, CRIB-II, and SNAPPE-II.评估极低出生体重儿的死亡风险:CRIB、CRIB-II和SNAPPE-II的比较。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004 Sep;89(5):F419-22. doi: 10.1136/adc.2003.031286.
9
An illness severity score and neonatal mortality in retrieved neonates.
Eur J Pediatr. 2004 Jul;163(7):385-9. doi: 10.1007/s00431-004-1451-8. Epub 2004 Apr 16.
10
Predicting outcome in very low birthweight infants using an objective measure of illness severity and cranial ultrasound scanning.使用客观的疾病严重程度测量方法和头颅超声扫描预测极低出生体重儿的预后。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1998 May;78(3):F175-8. doi: 10.1136/fn.78.3.f175.