Miller P D, Watts N B, Licata A A, Harris S T, Genant H K, Wasnich R D, Ross P D, Jackson R D, Hoseyni M S, Schoenfeld S L, Valent D J, Chesnut C H
University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, USA.
Am J Med. 1997 Dec;103(6):468-76. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(97)00278-7.
To determine the efficacy and safety of cyclical etidronate for up to 7 years in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis and to examine the effects of discontinuing treatment after 2 or 5 years of therapy.
Patients were randomized at entry into the original study in 1986 to blinded treatment for 2 years with either a calcium (placebo) or an intermittent cyclical etidronate regimen, which most patients continued for a third year. Following this phase of the study, patients were enrolled into an open-label, follow-up study (years 4 and 5), during which all patients received cyclical etidronate treatment. In the present double-blind study (years 6 and 7), patients were rerandomized to receive intermittent cyclical therapy with either etidronate or placebo; all patients received calcium. The treatment regimen consisted of 400 mg/day etidronate or placebo for 14 days, followed by 76 days of elemental calcium (500 mg/day); this cycle was repeated approximately 4 times in each year. Of the 193 patients who continued in years 6 and 7 of the study, 93 were randomized to receive cyclical etidronate and 100 were randomized to receive calcium only. For purposes of efficacy analyses, patients were categorized by their total years of cumulative etidronate treatment (7, 5, 4, or 2 years). There were 51, 46, 42, and 54 patients in the 7-, 5-, 4-, and 2-year groups, respectively. Annual assessments included lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD), as measured by densitometry, and vertebral radiographs.
The groups receiving cyclical etidronate during this 2-year study period (7- and 4-year groups) had statistically significant mean percent increases in spinal BMD of 1.8% and 2.2%, respectively (P < 0.05) at the week 104 observation time. The 5- and 2-year groups, which did not receive etidronate during this period, had mean values of 1.4% and 0.2%, respectively (not significant) at week 104. In the 7-, 5-, 4-, and 2-year groups, the increases in spinal BMD at the end of 7 years were 7.6%, 8.6%, 8.1%, and 3.9%, respectively; these values were statistically significant for all groups compared with original baseline (year 0) (P < 0.05). BMD of the femur and wrist was maintained throughout the 7-year period. The incidence and rate of vertebral fractures were lowest in patients with the longest exposure to etidronate. Etidronate was well tolerated during the study, with low incidences of gastrointestinal side effects and nonvertebral fractures.
Long-term cyclical etidronate is a safe, effective, and well-tolerated treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Bone mass is maintained for at least 2 years after treatment with etidronate is stopped; however, further gains in spinal bone mass are seen in patients who continue therapy.
确定周期性应用依替膦酸长达7年治疗绝经后骨质疏松症的疗效和安全性,并研究治疗2年或5年后停药的影响。
1986年最初研究入组的患者被随机分配接受为期2年的盲法治疗,治疗方案为钙剂(安慰剂)或间歇性周期性依替膦酸方案,大多数患者持续治疗至第3年。在该研究阶段之后,患者进入一项开放标签的随访研究(第4年和第5年),在此期间所有患者均接受周期性依替膦酸治疗。在当前的双盲研究(第6年和第7年)中,患者再次被随机分配接受依替膦酸或安慰剂的间歇性周期性治疗;所有患者均补充钙剂。治疗方案为每日400 mg依替膦酸或安慰剂,持续14天,随后76天补充元素钙(每日500 mg);该周期每年重复约4次。在研究第6年和第7年继续参与研究的193例患者中,93例被随机分配接受周期性依替膦酸治疗,100例被随机分配仅接受钙剂治疗。为进行疗效分析,根据依替膦酸累积治疗的总年数(7年、5年、4年或2年)对患者进行分类。7年组、5年组、4年组和2年组分别有51例、46例、42例和54例患者。每年的评估包括通过骨密度测定法测量的腰椎骨密度(BMD)以及脊椎X线片。
在这2年研究期间接受周期性依替膦酸治疗的组(7年组和4年组),在第104周观察时,脊柱BMD的平均百分比增加分别有统计学意义,为1.8%和2.2%(P<0.05)。在此期间未接受依替膦酸治疗 的5年组和2年组,在第104周时的平均值分别为1.4%和0.2%(无统计学意义)。在7年组、5年组、4年组和2年组中,7年末脊柱BMD的增加分别为7.6%、8.6%、8.1%和3.9%;与初始基线(第0年)相比,所有组的这些值均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。在整个7年期间,股骨和腕部的BMD保持稳定。依替膦酸暴露时间最长的患者中椎体骨折的发生率和骨折率最低。在研究期间依替膦酸耐受性良好,胃肠道副作用和非椎体骨折的发生率较低。
长期周期性应用依替膦酸是治疗绝经后骨质疏松症的一种安全、有效且耐受性良好的治疗方法。停止依替膦酸治疗后骨量至少维持2年;然而,继续治疗的患者脊柱骨量会进一步增加。