Pelletier K R
Stanford Corporate Health Program, Stanford University School of Medicine, Calif., USA.
J Occup Environ Med. 1997 Dec;39(12):1154-69. doi: 10.1097/00043764-199712000-00009.
This paper is a critical review of the clinical and cost outcome evaluation studies of multifactorial, comprehensive, cardiovascular risk management programs in worksites. A comprehensive international literature search conducted under the auspices of the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute identified 17 articles based on 12 studies that examined the clinical outcomes of multifactorial, comprehensive programs. These articles were identified through MEDLINE, manual searches of recent journals, and through direct inquiries to worksite health promotion researchers. All studies were conducted between 1978 and 1995, with 1978 being the date of the first citation of a methodologically rigorous evaluation. Of the 12 research studies, only 8 utilized the worksite as both the unit of assignment and as the unit of analysis. None of the studies analyzed adequately for cost effectiveness. Given this limitation, this review briefly considers the relevant worksite research that has demonstrated cost outcomes. Worksite-based, multifactorial cardiovascular intervention programs reviewed for this article varied widely in the comprehensiveness, intensity, and duration of both the interventions and evaluations. Results from randomized trials suggest that providing opportunities for individualized, cardiovascular risk reduction counseling for high-risk employees within the context of comprehensive programming may be the critical component of an effective worksite intervention. Despite the many limitations of the current methodologies of the 12 studies, the majority of the research to date indicates the following: (1) favorable clinical and cost outcomes; (2) that more recent and more rigorously designed research tends to support rather than refute earlier and less rigorously designed studies; and (3) that rather than interpreting the methodological flaws and diversity as inherently negative, one may consider it as indicative of a robust phenomena evident in many types of worksites, with diverse employees, differing interventions, and varying degrees of methodological sophistication. Results of these studies reviewed provide both cautious optimism about the effectiveness of these worksite programs and insights regarding the essential components and characteristics of successful programs.
本文是对工作场所多因素、综合性心血管风险管理项目的临床及成本效益评估研究的批判性综述。在美国国立心肺血液研究所的支持下进行了一次全面的国际文献检索,基于12项研究确定了17篇文章,这些研究考察了多因素、综合性项目的临床结果。这些文章是通过医学文献数据库(MEDLINE)、近期期刊的手工检索以及直接向工作场所健康促进研究人员咨询确定的。所有研究均在1978年至1995年期间进行,1978年是首次引用方法严谨的评估的年份。在这12项研究中,只有8项将工作场所既作为分配单位又作为分析单位。没有一项研究对成本效益进行了充分分析。鉴于这一局限性,本综述简要考虑了已证明成本效益的相关工作场所研究。本文所综述的基于工作场所的多因素心血管干预项目在干预和评估的全面性、强度及持续时间方面差异很大。随机试验结果表明,在综合项目的背景下为高危员工提供个性化心血管风险降低咨询的机会可能是有效工作场所干预的关键组成部分。尽管这12项研究的当前方法存在诸多局限性,但迄今为止的大多数研究表明:(1)临床和成本效益良好;(2)近期设计更严谨的研究倾向于支持而非反驳早期设计较不严谨的研究;(3)与其将方法缺陷和多样性解释为本质上是负面的,不如将其视为许多类型工作场所中明显存在的一种强大现象的指标,这些工作场所员工不同、干预措施不同且方法复杂性程度不同。这些综述研究的结果既让人对这些工作场所项目的有效性持谨慎乐观态度,也让人对成功项目的基本组成部分和特征有了深入了解。