Silvestri M, Oddera S, Crimi P, Rossi G A
Division of Pneumology, G. Gaslini Institute, University of Genoa, Italy.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1997 Dec;79(6):512-6. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)63058-X.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the frequency of allergy in 85 families of pediatric patients with asthma and/or rhinitis.
Families enrolled were drawn according to a table of randomization, from those whose children were referred the outpatient clinic of the Pulmonology Department of Gaslini Institute (Genoa, Italy). In patients and in both their mothers and fathers, allergic sensitization to the three most common classes of inhalant allergens (house dust mites, pollens, and animal danders) was evaluated by skin prick test.
As compared with their parents, children showed a similar prevalence of positive skin prick test (50.0% and 58.8%, respectively; chi 2 = 1.4; P > .1), but a significantly higher frequency of specific sensitization to house dust mites, pollens, or pets (P < .05, each chi 2). These differences were at least partially related to the higher frequency of polysensitization (i.e., sensitization to more than one class of allergens) in children than in their parents [chi 2 = 4.2, odds ratio (OR) = 2.3, 95% confidence interval (CI95%) = 1.0 to 5.1; P < .05). In addition, both in children (chi 2 = 5.8, OR = 11.3, CI95% = 1.4 to 81.5; P < .05] and in their parents (chi 2 = 7.4, OR = 4.8, CI95% = 1.5 to 16.7; P < .01), allergy to pollens was less frequent in monosensitized than in polysensitized families, while the prevalence of sensitization to house dust mites was similar in monosensitized and in polysensitized families. The analysis of the role of parental sensitization in the development of allergy in the offspring demonstrated that the prevalence of allergic children: (1) seemed to be higher, without reaching statistical significance, in families with sensitized parents than in those with non-sensitized parents (chi 2 = 0.41, P > .1) and (2) was higher in families with one or both polysensitized parents than in those with one or both monosensitized parents (chi 2 = 4.5, OR = 4.0, CI95% = 1.1 to 15.6; P < .05). In addition, within each family, the coincidence of sensitization to house dust mites was more frequent than that to pollens (60.0% and 36.0%, respectively; chi 2 = 7.6, OR = 4.5, CI95% = 1.5 to 14.3; P < .01), and it was not influenced by the number of parents sensitized to same allergen.
These data support the concept that, in addition to genetic predisposition, other factors (i.e., environmental exposure) may influence the development of specific sensitization in children with respiratory symptoms. The different sensitization found in this study between children and their parents occurred in a generation span, so as it is more likely to be related to environmental changes than to genetic factors.
本研究旨在调查85个患有哮喘和/或鼻炎的儿科患者家庭中的过敏频率。
根据随机化表从那些孩子被转诊至加斯林尼研究所(意大利热那亚)肺病科门诊的家庭中选取入组家庭。对患者及其父母进行针对三种最常见吸入性过敏原(屋尘螨、花粉和动物皮屑)的过敏致敏情况评估,采用皮肤点刺试验。
与父母相比,儿童皮肤点刺试验阳性率相似(分别为50.0%和58.8%;卡方值=1.4;P>.1),但对屋尘螨、花粉或宠物的特异性致敏频率显著更高(每个卡方值P<.05)。这些差异至少部分与儿童中多致敏(即对不止一类过敏原致敏)的频率高于其父母有关[卡方值=4.2,比值比(OR)=2.3,95%置信区间(CI95%)=1.0至5.1;P<.05]。此外,在儿童中(卡方值=5.8,OR=11.3,CI95%=1.4至81.5;P<.05)以及在其父母中(卡方值=7.4,OR=4.8,CI95%=1.5至16.7;P<.01),单致敏家庭中对花粉过敏的频率低于多致敏家庭,而单致敏家庭和多致敏家庭中对屋尘螨致敏的患病率相似。对父母致敏在后代过敏发生中的作用分析表明,过敏儿童的患病率:(1)在父母致敏的家庭中似乎高于父母未致敏的家庭,但未达到统计学意义(卡方值=0.41,P>.1);(2)在父母一方或双方多致敏的家庭中高于父母一方或双方单致敏的家庭(卡方值=4.5,OR=4.0,CI95%=1.1至15.6;P<.05)。此外,在每个家庭中,对屋尘螨致敏的一致性比花粉更常见(分别为60.0%和36.0%;卡方值=7.6,OR=4.5,CI95%=1.5至14.3;P<.01),且不受对同一过敏原致敏的父母数量影响。
这些数据支持这样的概念,即除了遗传易感性外,其他因素(即环境暴露)可能影响有呼吸道症状儿童的特异性致敏发展。本研究中儿童与其父母之间发现的不同致敏情况发生在一代人的时间跨度内,因此更可能与环境变化而非遗传因素有关。