Wong S S, Teo D L, Chan R K
National Skin Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Int J STD AIDS. 1997 Dec;8(12):760-3. doi: 10.1258/0956462971919237.
Seventy-two blood donors who were tested positive by the Singapore Blood Transfusion Service (SBTS) for Treponema pallidum haemagglutination (TPHA) test, were evaluated at the Department of Sexually Transmitted Diseases Clinic (DSC) between November 1994 to December 1996. All underwent syphilis serological testing, including rapid plasma reagin test (RPR), TPHA test and fluorescent treponemal antibody-absorption (FTA-Abs) test. All except one (98.6%) were confirmed TPHA positive by the DSC. Of the 71 TPHA-confirmed-positive donors, 53 (74.6%) were subsequently tested positive for FTA-Abs and 18 (25.4%) were tested negative for FTA-Abs. Twenty-two (31%) of the 71 TPHA-positive blood donors had reactive RPR and 49 (69%) had non-reactive RPR. Of the 22 TPHA-positive donors who had reactive RPR, 19 (86%) had positive FTA-Abs (13 late latent syphilis, 4 serological scar, one late congenital syphilis, one secondary syphilis), and 3 (14%) had negative FTA-Abs (all late latent syphilis). Of the 49 TPHA-positive donors who had non-reactive RPR, 34 (69%) had positive FTA-Abs (24 late latent syphilis, 9 serological scar, one late congenital syphilis) and 15 (31%) had negative FTA-Abs (12 late latent syphilis, 2 serological scar, one false-positive TPHA). Only one TPHA-positive donor referred by the SBTS subsequently turned out to have negative syphilis serology at the DSC. Overall, 68 (95.8%) TPHA-positive donors who had a past history of sexual exposure were managed as treated or untreated syphilis, regardless of their RPR or FTA-Abs results. However, FTA-Abs was found to be useful in the management of 3 (4.2%) TPHA-positive blood donors in the absence of a history of sexual exposures.
1994年11月至1996年12月期间,新加坡输血服务中心(SBTS)梅毒螺旋体血细胞凝集试验(TPHA)检测呈阳性的72名献血者,在性传播疾病诊所(DSC)接受了评估。所有人都接受了梅毒血清学检测,包括快速血浆反应素试验(RPR)、TPHA试验和荧光密螺旋体抗体吸收试验(FTA-Abs)。除一人外(98.6%),所有献血者均被DSC确认为TPHA阳性。在71名TPHA确诊阳性的献血者中,53人(74.6%)随后FTA-Abs检测呈阳性,18人(25.4%)FTA-Abs检测呈阴性。71名TPHA阳性献血者中,22人(31%)RPR呈反应性,49人(69%)RPR呈非反应性。在22名RPR呈反应性的TPHA阳性献血者中,19人(86%)FTA-Abs呈阳性(13例晚期潜伏梅毒、4例血清学瘢痕、1例晚期先天性梅毒、1例二期梅毒),3人(14%)FTA-Abs呈阴性(均为晚期潜伏梅毒)。在49名RPR呈非反应性的TPHA阳性献血者中,34人(69%)FTA-Abs呈阳性(24例晚期潜伏梅毒、9例血清学瘢痕、1例晚期先天性梅毒),15人(31%)FTA-Abs呈阴性(12例晚期潜伏梅毒、2例血清学瘢痕、1例假阳性TPHA)。SBTS转诊的TPHA阳性献血者中,只有一人后来在DSC梅毒血清学检测呈阴性。总体而言,68名(95.8%)有性接触史的TPHA阳性献血者,无论其RPR或FTA-Abs结果如何,均按已治疗或未治疗的梅毒进行处理。然而,在没有性接触史的情况下,FTA-Abs被发现对3名(4.2%)TPHA阳性献血者的管理有用。