Bishop J B, Witt K L, Sloane R A
Laboratory of Toxicology, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA.
Mutat Res. 1997 Dec 12;396(1-2):9-43. doi: 10.1016/s0027-5107(97)00173-5.
Birth defects cause a myriad of societal problems and place tremendous anguish on the affected individual and his or her family. Current estimates categorize about 3% of all newborn infants as having some form of birth defect or congenital anomaly. As more precise means of detecting subtle anomalies become available this estimate, no doubt, will increase. Even though birth defects have been observed in newborns throughout history, our knowledge about the causes and mechanisms through which these defects are manifested is limited. For example, it has been estimated that around 20% of all birth defects are due to gene mutations, 5-10% to chromosomal abnormalities, and another 5-10% to exposure to a known teratogenic agent or maternal factor [D.A. Beckman, R.L. Brent, Mechanisms of teratogenesis. Ann. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 24 (1984) 483-500; K. Nelson, L.B. Holmes Malformations due to presumed spontaneous mutations in newborn infants, N. Engl. J. Med. 320 (1989) 19-23.]. Together, these percentages account for only 30-40%, leaving the etiology of more than half of all human birth defects unexplained. It has been speculated that environmental factors account for no more than one-tenth of all congenital anomalies [D.A. Beckman, R.L. Brent, Mechanisms of teratogenesis, Ann. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 24 (1984) 483-500]. Furthermore, since there is no evidence in humans that the exposure of an individual to any mutagen measurably increases the risk of congenital anomalies in his or her offspring' [J.F. Crow, C. Denniston, Mutation in human populations, Adv. Human Genet. 14 (1985) 59-121; J.M. Friedman, J.E. Polifka, Teratogenic Effects of Drugs: A Resource for Clinicians (TERIS). The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1994], the mutagenic activity of environmental agents and drugs as a factor in teratogenesis has been given very little attention. Epigenetic activity has also been given only limited consideration as a mechanism for teratogenesis. As new molecular methods are developed for assessing processes associated with teratogenesis, especially those with a genetic or an epigenetic basis, additional environmental factors may be identified. These are especially important because they are potentially preventable. This paper examines the relationships between chemicals identified as human teratogens (agents that cause birth defects) and their mutagenic activity as evaluated in one or more of the established short-term bioassays currently used to measure such damage. Those agents lacking mutagenic activity but with published evidence that they may otherwise alter the expressions or regulate interactions of the genetic material, i.e. exhibit epigenetic activity, have likewise been identified. The information used in making these comparisons comes from the published literature as well as from unpublished data of the U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP).
出生缺陷会引发无数社会问题,并给受影响的个体及其家庭带来巨大痛苦。目前的估计表明,约3%的新生儿患有某种形式的出生缺陷或先天性异常。随着检测细微异常的更精确方法问世,这一估计数字无疑将会上升。尽管有史以来在新生儿中都能观察到出生缺陷,但我们对这些缺陷产生的原因和机制的了解仍然有限。例如,据估计,所有出生缺陷中约20%是由基因突变导致的,5% - 10%是由染色体异常引起的,另有5% - 10%是由于接触已知的致畸剂或母体因素所致[D.A. 贝克曼、R.L. 布伦特,《致畸机制》。《药物毒理学年度评论》24 (1984) 483 - 500;K. 尼尔森、L.B. 霍姆斯,《新生儿中因推测的自发突变导致的畸形》,《新英格兰医学杂志》320 (1989) 19 - 23]。这些百分比加起来仅占30% - 40%,这意味着超过一半的人类出生缺陷的病因尚不清楚。据推测,环境因素在所有先天性异常中所占比例不超过十分之一[D.A. 贝克曼、R.L. 布伦特,《致畸机制》,《药物毒理学年度评论》24 (1984) 483 - 500]。此外,由于在人类中没有证据表明个体接触任何诱变剂会显著增加其后代患先天性异常的风险[J.F. 克劳、C. 丹尼斯顿,《人类群体中的突变》,《人类遗传学进展》14 (1985) 59 - 121;J.M. 弗里德曼、J.E. 波利夫卡,《药物的致畸作用:临床医生资源手册(TERIS)》。约翰·霍普金斯大学出版社,巴尔的摩,1994],环境因素和药物的诱变活性作为致畸因素一直很少受到关注。表观遗传活性作为致畸机制也仅得到了有限的考虑。随着用于评估与致畸作用相关过程的新分子方法的发展,尤其是那些基于遗传或表观遗传基础的方法,可能会发现更多的环境因素。这些因素尤为重要,因为它们有可能被预防。本文研究了被确定为人类致畸剂(导致出生缺陷的因素)的化学物质与其诱变活性之间的关系,这些诱变活性是通过目前用于测量此类损伤的一种或多种既定短期生物测定法评估得出的。那些缺乏诱变活性但有已发表证据表明它们可能以其他方式改变遗传物质的表达或调节其相互作用,即表现出表观遗传活性的物质也已被确定。用于进行这些比较的信息来自已发表的文献以及美国国家毒理学计划(NTP)的未发表数据。