Coffin C M, Rulon J, Smith L, Bruggers C, White F V
Department of Pathology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City 84113, USA.
Mod Pathol. 1997 Dec;10(12):1175-87.
Few studies have analyzed the relationship among pathology, therapy-induced changes, proliferative activity, and outcome for rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), despite the challenges of histopathologic interpretation of this tumor after treatment. Although cytodifferentiation and decreased mitotic activity after treatment were documented previously, the clinical consequences of these changes are uncertain because of the small number of cases analyzed. We analyzed 16 RMSs with pre- and post-treatment specimens for clinicopathologic features, outcome, and immunohistochemical data on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue for vimentin, smooth muscle actin, muscle-specific actin, desmin, myoglobin, p53 protein, topoisomerase II-alpha, and MIB-1 proliferative activity. Four of eight alveolar (ARMS), five of five botryoid (BRMS), and two of three nonbotryoid embryonal (ERMS) RMSs displayed varying degrees of post-therapeutic histologic maturation and expressed one or more myoid markers. The remaining five RMSs had no cytodifferentiation. Myoid marker expression did not change significantly. In BRMS, MIB-1 and topoisomerase II-alpha proliferative activity decreased after therapy and correlated with cytodifferentiation and survival. This relationship was less clear for ERMS and ARMS. Five nonbotryoid RMSs without cytodifferentiation had either unchanged or increased proliferative activity, and four of these patients died of RMS. Six nonbotryoid RMSs with both cytodifferentiation and residual foci of undifferentiated cells had variable outcomes, including longer survival. We conclude that BRMS and ERMS exhibit therapy-induced cytodifferentiation more frequently than does ARMS. Cytodifferentiation and decreased proliferative activity are associated with favorable outcome in BRMS; unchanged or increased post-therapeutic proliferative activity suggests aggressive biologic potential in ERMS and ARMS. Combined patterns of cytodifferentiation and residual undifferentiated foci might be associated with increased, decreased, or unchanged proliferative activity and are difficult to interpret, but the presence of cytodifferentiation might presage an improved survival. Immunohistochemical analysis for proliferation markers might be useful for highlighting foci of less differentiated RMS or cytodifferentiated tumor cells in contrast to non-neoplastic, terminally differentiated muscle cells.
尽管横纹肌肉瘤(RMS)治疗后组织病理学解释存在挑战,但很少有研究分析其病理、治疗诱导变化、增殖活性和预后之间的关系。虽然之前记录了治疗后细胞分化和有丝分裂活性降低的情况,但由于分析的病例数量较少,这些变化的临床后果尚不确定。我们分析了16例RMS患者治疗前后的标本,观察其临床病理特征、预后,并对福尔马林固定、石蜡包埋组织进行免疫组化检测,检测波形蛋白、平滑肌肌动蛋白、肌肉特异性肌动蛋白、结蛋白、肌红蛋白、p53蛋白、拓扑异构酶II-α以及MIB-1增殖活性。8例腺泡状(ARMS)RMS中的4例、5例葡萄状(BRMS)RMS中的5例以及3例非葡萄状胚胎性(ERMS)RMS中的2例表现出不同程度的治疗后组织学成熟,并表达一种或多种肌样标志物。其余5例RMS没有细胞分化。肌样标志物表达没有显著变化。在BRMS中,治疗后MIB-1和拓扑异构酶II-α增殖活性降低,并与细胞分化和生存相关。对于ERMS和ARMS,这种关系不太明确。5例没有细胞分化的非葡萄状RMS增殖活性要么未改变,要么增加,其中4例患者死于RMS。6例既有细胞分化又有未分化细胞残留灶的非葡萄状RMS预后各不相同,包括生存期更长。我们得出结论,BRMS和ERMS比ARMS更频繁地表现出治疗诱导的细胞分化。细胞分化和增殖活性降低与BRMS的良好预后相关;治疗后增殖活性未改变或增加表明ERMS和ARMS具有侵袭性生物学潜能。细胞分化和残留未分化灶的组合模式可能与增殖活性增加、降低或未改变相关,且难以解释,但细胞分化的存在可能预示生存期改善。对增殖标志物进行免疫组化分析可能有助于突出与非肿瘤性终末分化肌肉细胞相比,分化程度较低的RMS或细胞分化肿瘤细胞的病灶。