• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

门诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术:安全且具成本效益?

Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: safe and cost effective?

作者信息

Zegarra R F, Saba A K, Peschiera J L

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Good Samaritan Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio 45220, USA.

出版信息

Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1997 Dec;7(6):487-90.

PMID:9438633
Abstract

Among the many advantages of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), which has become the standard of care for symptomatic gallbladder disease, is the decrease in hospital stay. Although some studies of outpatient LC are starting to appear, few compare return visits to the hospital up to 30 days after surgery as well as cost of hospitalization between a group of outpatients and overnight admission patients. From January through December 1994, 415 LCs were attempted at Good Samaritan Hospital. Total hospitalization charges were obtained for a comparable subset of the outpatient and 24-h observation patients. There were 229 LCs performed without difficulty on an outpatient basis and 90 performed with a 24-h hold. Of the 229 outpatient LCs, only 1.3% had minor problems related to LC. Of the 90 LCs performed with 24-h hold, only 2.2% had problems related to the LC. The average charge for LC with overnight admission $4,890.37; the average charge for outpatient surgery was $3,669.54 (p < 0.0001). There was no increase in patient morbidity or mortality associated with outpatient LC. The cost savings for outpatient surgery compared with surgery with 24-h admission was 25%.

摘要

腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)已成为有症状胆囊疾病的标准治疗方法,其诸多优点之一是住院时间缩短。尽管一些关于门诊LC的研究开始出现,但很少有研究比较术后30天内的复诊情况以及一组门诊患者和过夜入院患者之间的住院费用。1994年1月至12月,善萨玛利亚医院共尝试进行了415例LC手术。获取了门诊患者和24小时观察患者中可比子集的总住院费用。有229例LC手术在门诊顺利完成,90例进行了24小时观察。在229例门诊LC手术中,只有1.3%出现了与LC相关的小问题。在90例进行24小时观察的LC手术中,只有2.2%出现了与LC相关的问题。过夜入院LC手术的平均费用为4,890.37美元;门诊手术的平均费用为3,669.54美元(p < 0.0001)。门诊LC手术并未增加患者的发病率或死亡率。与24小时入院手术相比,门诊手术节省的费用为25%。

相似文献

1
Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: safe and cost effective?门诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术:安全且具成本效益?
Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1997 Dec;7(6):487-90.
2
In selected patients outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe and significantly reduces hospitalization charges.对于部分选定患者,门诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术是安全的,且能显著降低住院费用。
Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1991 Dec;1(4):240-5.
3
[Ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy is as effective as hospitalization and from a social perspective less expensive: a randomized study].[门诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术与住院手术同样有效,且从社会角度来看成本更低:一项随机研究]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2001 Dec 15;145(50):2434-9.
4
Average charges for cholecystectomies in the United States, 1996.1996年美国胆囊切除术的平均费用。
Stat Bull Metrop Insur Co. 1998 Oct-Dec;79(4):16-25.
5
Cost-effectiveness of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy.门诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术的成本效益
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2001 Jun;11(3):182-4.
6
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: cost analysis.腹腔镜胆囊切除术:成本分析
Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1991 Jun;1(2):77-81.
7
Outpatient cholecystectomy at hospitals versus freestanding ambulatory surgical centers.医院门诊胆囊切除术与独立门诊手术中心的比较。
J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Feb;206(2):301-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.07.042. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
8
Is there a safe advantage in performing outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy in children?儿童门诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术是否存在安全优势?
J Pediatr Surg. 2007 Aug;42(8):1333-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.03.028.
9
Routine outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy.常规门诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术
Can J Surg. 1995 Jun;38(3):262-5.
10
A prospective review of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Brunei.文莱腹腔镜胆囊切除术的前瞻性研究。
Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1998 Apr;8(2):120-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility and cost effectiveness of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A retrospective cohort study.门诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术的可行性和成本效益。一项回顾性队列研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020 May 12;55:56-61. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.04.036. eCollection 2020 Jul.
2
Statewide Longitudinal Hospital Use and Charges for Pediatric and Adolescent Patients With Cancer.全州范围内癌症患儿和青少年患者的纵向医院使用情况及费用
J Oncol Pract. 2015 Jul;11(4):e468-75. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2014.003590. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
3
Current trends in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
腹腔镜胆囊切除术的当前趋势
J Family Community Med. 1997 Jul;4(2):33-40.
4
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a day surgery procedure: is it safe?--an egyptian experience.腹腔镜胆囊切除术作为日间手术程序:安全吗?——埃及的经验。
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2011 Jul-Aug;17(4):277-9. doi: 10.4103/1319-3767.82584.
5
Economic and patient-reported outcomes of outpatient home-based versus inpatient hospital-based chemotherapy for patients with colorectal cancer.门诊家庭为基础的与住院医院为基础的化疗对结直肠癌患者的经济学和患者报告结局比较。
Support Care Cancer. 2011 Jul;19(7):971-8. doi: 10.1007/s00520-010-0917-7. Epub 2010 May 23.
6
Ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Is it safe and cost effective?门诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术:它安全且具有成本效益吗?
J Minim Access Surg. 2009 Jan;5(1):8-13. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.51314.
7
An audit of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a Singapore institution: are we ready for day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy?在新加坡机构中对门诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术进行审核:我们是否准备好进行日间腹腔镜胆囊切除术?
HPB (Oxford). 2008;10(6):433-8. doi: 10.1080/13651820802392312.
8
Resumption of daily physical activity after day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy.日间腹腔镜胆囊切除术后日常身体活动的恢复
Surg Endosc. 2009 Sep;23(9):2034-40. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9928-6. Epub 2008 Apr 25.
9
A meta-analysis of ambulatory versus inpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy.门诊与住院腹腔镜胆囊切除术的荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2008 Sep;22(9):1928-34. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9867-2. Epub 2008 Apr 9.
10
Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: clinical pathway implementation is efficient and cost effective and increases hospital bed capacity.门诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术:临床路径的实施高效且具有成本效益,还能增加医院床位容量。
Surg Endosc. 2007 Jul;21(7):1142-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-9083-x. Epub 2007 Jan 20.