Lalitha M K, Manayani D J, Priya L, Jesudason M V, Thomas K, Steinhoff M C
Department of Clinical Microbiology, Christian Medical College & Hospital, Vellore.
Indian J Med Res. 1997 Dec;106:500-3.
A commercial E test was compared with the standard agar dilution method for the determination of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of penicillin, erythromycin, chloramphenicol and cefotaxime for 36 strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae from patients with invasive diseases. Additional strains were tested for MIC values for penicillin (6), erythromycin (14) and cefotaxime (13) for a better statistical evaluation. Besides, 5 reference standards with predetermined MIC values obtained from WHO pneumococcal reference center at Copenhagen, Denmark were tested for penicillin and erythromycin, for quality assessment using both agar dilution as well as E test methods. An overall agreement within +/- 2 dilutions was noted for 97 per cent of the strains tested for all the antimicrobials. A high degree of correlation was noted for erythromycin (r = 1), penicillin (r = 0.99), chloramphenicol (r = 0.95) and cefotaxime (r = 0.9). In MIC determination of a single antimicrobial for diagnostic purpose, E test was found to be more cost effective than conventional agar dilution method. E test was simple to perform, easy to interpret and a valid method for MIC determination of antimicrobials for S. pneumoniae in our center.
将一种商业化的E试验与标准琼脂稀释法进行比较,以测定36株来自侵袭性疾病患者的肺炎链球菌对青霉素、红霉素、氯霉素和头孢噻肟的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)。为了进行更好的统计学评估,还对其他菌株进行了青霉素(6株)、红霉素(14株)和头孢噻肟(13株)的MIC值检测。此外,对从丹麦哥本哈根的世界卫生组织肺炎球菌参考中心获得的5个具有预定MIC值的参考标准品进行了青霉素和红霉素检测,采用琼脂稀释法和E试验法进行质量评估。对于所有抗菌药物检测的菌株,97%的菌株在±2个稀释度内显示总体一致性。红霉素(r = 1)、青霉素(r = 0.99)、氯霉素(r = 0.95)和头孢噻肟(r = 0.9)呈现高度相关性。在用于诊断目的的单一抗菌药物的MIC测定中,发现E试验比传统琼脂稀释法更具成本效益。E试验操作简单、易于解读,是我们中心测定肺炎链球菌抗菌药物MIC的有效方法。